Uncertain seismic response and robustness analysis of isolated continuous girder bridges

被引:2
作者
Long, Xiaohong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zonglin [1 ]
Gu, Xiaopeng [1 ]
Chen, Xingwang [3 ]
Ma, Yongtao [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil & Hydraul Engn, 1037 Guan Shan St, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Hubei Key Lab Control Struct, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] China Acad Engn Phys, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
isolated continuous girder bridge; interval variant; seismic response; robustness; radial basis neural network; genetic algorithm; STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS; STATIC RESPONSE; BEHAVIOR; BOUNDS;
D O I
10.1177/13694332241281533
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
When calculating the seismic response of structures, conventional methods often neglect uncertainty and suffer from excessive computation. Although robustness metrics have been effective in evaluating structural safety, they are not suitable for isolated continuous girder bridges (ICGB). To address this issue, this paper introduces an uncertain seismic response and robustness assessment method tailored to ICGB: Firstly, the method considers uncertainty in material parameters and ground motion by constructing a data set using Monte Carlo simulation. Secondly, a genetic algorithm for parallel optimisation of radial basis function neural network (GAPO-RBFNN) is trained to predict the seismic responses of the bridges. Thirdly, a robustness metric specifically designed for bridges is derived and applied to bridge. Finally, the proposed robustness metric is validated on lead rubber bearing (LRB) and shape memory alloy-lead rubber bearing (SMA-LRB) bridges. Results indicate that the GAPO-RBFNN model accurately approximates the mapping relationship between structural parameters and seismic response, with an average error of only 0.32% and a 70% reduction in computation time compared with traditional methods. Moreover, the new robustness metric overcomes the limitations of the dismantled member method and is applicable to bridge. The robustness of the SMA-LRB-ICGB, strengthened by SMA, is improved, providing evidence of the effectiveness of the proposed robustness metric.
引用
收藏
页码:2733 / 2749
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Proposing a Method for Robustness Index Evaluation of the Structures Based on the Risk Analysis of Main Shock and Aftershock [J].
Abdollahzadeh, Gholamreza ;
Faghihmaleki, Hadi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEEL STRUCTURES, 2018, 18 (05) :1710-1722
[2]   On the assessment of robustness [J].
Baker, Jack W. ;
Schubert, Matthias ;
Faber, Michael H. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (03) :253-267
[3]   Uncertainty Analysis Based on Kriging Meta-Model for Acoustic-Structural Problems [J].
Baklouti, Ahmad ;
Dammak, Khalil ;
El Hami, Abdelkhalak .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03)
[4]   Seismic analysis of base isolated buildings [J].
Barbat, AH ;
Bozzo, LM .
ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1997, 4 (02) :153-192
[5]   Reliability-based approach to the robustness of corroded reinforced concrete structures [J].
Cavaco, Eduardo S. ;
Neves, Luis A. C. ;
Casas, Joan R. .
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2017, 18 (02) :316-325
[6]   Robustness of corroded reinforced concrete structures - a structural performance approach [J].
Cavaco, Eduardo S. ;
Casas, Joan R. ;
Neves, Luis A. C. ;
Huespe, Alfredo E. .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2013, 9 (01) :42-58
[7]   Robustness Analysis of a Flexible Cable-Strut Tensile Structure [J].
Chen, Lian-meng ;
Gao, Wei-feng ;
Jiang, Zhi-chao ;
Zhou, Yi-yi ;
Zhang, Fu-bo ;
Dong, Shi-lin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEEL STRUCTURES, 2020, 20 (05) :1755-1764
[8]   A novel uncertainty analysis method for composite structures with mixed uncertainties including random and interval variables [J].
Chen, Xiao ;
Qiu, Zhiping .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2018, 184 :400-410
[9]   Assessment of Structural Robustness under Different Events according to Vulnerability [J].
Chen, Yong-Liang ;
Huang, Liang ;
Lu, Yi-Qiu ;
Deng, Lu ;
Tan, Hao-Zhi .
JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2016, 30 (05)
[10]   A comparison of models for uncertainty analysis by the finite element method [J].
de Lima, BSLP ;
Ebecken, NFF .
FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2000, 34 (02) :211-232