Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:10
|
作者
Kumar, Amarjeet [1 ]
Sinha, Chandni [2 ]
Kumar, Ajeet [2 ]
Kumari, Poonam [2 ]
Kumar, Abhyuday [2 ]
Agrawal, Prabhat [3 ]
Vamshi, Chethan [2 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Trauma & Emergency, Patna, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol, Patna, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed, Patna, India
关键词
erector spinae plane block; modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block; lumbar spine; analgesia; pain; TLIP BLOCK; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; ENHANCED RECOVERY; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1097/ANA.0000000000000900
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Lumbar spine surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. Interfascial plane blocks, such as erector spinae plane (ESP) and thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) blocks, can play a significant role in multimodal analgesic regimens. Methods: Sixty patients aged 18 to 60 years undergoing elective single or double-level lumbar discectomy or primary lumbar laminoplasty were recruited into this randomized double-blind study. All patients received general anesthesia and were randomly allocated to either modified TLIP (mTLIP) block (group M) or ESP block (group E). Postoperative and intraoperative fentanyl consumption, and postoperative pain scores, were recorded. Results: Total 48 h postoperative fentanyl consumption was higher in Group M (189.66 +/- 141.11 mu g) than in Group E (124.16 +/- 80.83 mu g; P=0.031). In the first 24 postoperative hours, fentanyl consumption was higher in Group M (150.3 +/- 120.9 mu g) than in group E (89.9 +/- 65.3 mu g; P=0.01) but was similar between groups in postoperative hours 24to 48 (39.0 +/- 20.2 mu g versus 34.7 +/- 17.1 mu g in group M and group E, respectively; P=0.37). Additional intraoperative fentanyl requirement was 57.66 +/- 21.76 mu g in group M compared with 40.33 +/- 21.89 mu g in group E (P<0.01). Postoperative pain scores were higher in group M than in group E at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (P<0.001), but similar at 48 hours (P=0.164). Conclusion: Compared with the mTLIP block, the ESP block was associated with lower pain scores and a small decrease in perioperative fentanyl consumption in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries. Both blocks could form a part of a multimodal analgesic regimen in spine surgery patients.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 124
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery
    Peng, Qing
    Meng, Bo
    Yang, Sheng
    Ban, Zhenghu
    Zhang, Yu
    Hu, Man
    Zhao, Wenjie
    Wu, Haisheng
    Tao, Yuping
    Zhang, Liang
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 40 (02): : 114 - 123
  • [2] Lumbar spine surgeries: Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
    Solanki, Rekha N.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 69 (04) : 421 - 421
  • [3] Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block and erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing spine surgery
    Chitneni, Ahish
    Hasoon, Jamal
    Urits, Ivan
    Viswanath, Omar
    Orhurhu, Vwaire
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Eskander, Jonathan P.
    ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2021, 53 (04) : 366 - 367
  • [4] Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Khor, Wei-Thing
    Chang, Yu
    Tien, Chih-Hao
    Chen, Liang-Yi
    Hsu, Hao-Hsiang
    Perng, Pang-Shuo
    Wong, Chia-En
    Hsu, Heng-Juei
    Lee, Jung-Shun
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (02) : 1367 - 1374
  • [5] Alternatives for erector spinae plane block: retrolaminar block and thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
    Lai, Wen-Yi
    Chuang, Ching-Wei
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2024, 90 (11) : 1051 - 1052
  • [6] Analgesic efficacy of classical thoracolumbar interfascial plane block versus modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar disc surgeries: A comparative, randomised controlled trial
    Mondal, Sourav
    Pandey, Ravinder Kumar
    Kumar, Mritunjay
    Sharma, Ankur
    Darlong, Vanlal
    Punj, Jyotsna
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (04) : 366 - 373
  • [7] Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Modified-Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block for Lumbar Discectomy Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Study
    Ciftci, Bahadir
    Ekinci, Mursel
    Celik, Erkan Cem
    Yayik, Ahmet Murat
    Aydin, Muhammed Enes
    Ahiskalioglu, Ali
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 144 : E849 - E855
  • [8] Comparison of efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries: A systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis
    Majage, Siddhavivek
    Ravikumar, Rajathadri Hosur
    Prasanna, Mrudula
    Chandramouli, M.
    Datta, Priyankar Kumar
    Baidya, Dalim Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (09)
  • [9] Postoperative quality of recovery with erector spinae plane block or thoracolumbar interfascial plane block after major spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Ayşegül Bilge
    Betül Başaran
    European Spine Journal, 2024, 33 : 68 - 76
  • [10] Postoperative quality of recovery with erector spinae plane block or thoracolumbar interfascial plane block after major spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Bilge, Aysegul
    Basaran, Betul
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (01) : 68 - 76