Mathematical modeling of subsurface flow constructed wetlands performance for arsenic removal: Review and perspectives

被引:0
作者
Bravo-Riquelme, Diego [1 ]
Lizama-Allende, Katherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Dept Ingn Civil, Ave Blanco Encalada 2002, Santiago 8370449, Chile
关键词
Constructed wetlands; Subsurface flow; Arsenic reactivity; Mathematical model; Mechanistic model; Water treatment; RETENTION; REMEDIATION; WATER; SIMULATION; DYNAMICS; SORPTION; METAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175061
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Constructed wetlands are nature-based solutions able to remove different pollutants from water, including arsenic. Arsenic is a pollutant of concern given its toxicity and its presence in water sources worldwide. Despite the increased interest in investigating the performance of constructed wetlands in the treatment of arseniccontaminated water at the laboratory scale, the application of these solutions at the pilot and full scale is still limited. To understand and predict the removal of arsenic in constructed wetlands, some numerical models have been developed. Among black box models, only first-order models have been proposed, with unsuccessful results. The model that best describes arsenic retention processes in constructed wetlands is RCB-ARSENIC, a mechanistic model adapted from Retraso-CodeBright that simulates arsenic reactive transport. This model includes arsenic precipitation, arsenic sorption on supporting media, arsenic sorption on plants roots and arsenic uptake by plants; represented in the reactive term of the reactive transport equation. Thus, it includes two of the three main processes that remove arsenic in constructed wetlands: precipitation, sorption, and coprecipitation. Despite this, and what is known about arsenic geochemistry, the formulation of these reactive rates requires improvement. In addition, this model was calibrated and validated using data from a single horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland system, which treated one type of synthetic water. Therefore, it cannot be applied to other types of arsenic-contaminated water or other constructed wetland systems. Moreover, the reactive transport of relevant species -especially iron- and their role in arsenic removal, along with relevant redox reactions associated to the presence of organic matter, oxides or bacteria-, must be included. A comprehensive mechanistic model
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [11] Constructed wetlands as an alternative for arsenic removal from reverse osmosis effluent
    Corroto, C.
    Iriel, A.
    Fernandez Cirelli, A.
    Perez Carrera, A. L.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 691 : 1242 - 1250
  • [12] Modelling approaches for simulating wetland pollutant dynamics
    Defo, Celestin
    Kaur, Ravinder
    Bharadwaj, Anshu
    Lal, Khajanchi
    Kumar, Paritosh
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 47 (15) : 1371 - 1408
  • [13] Application of phytoremediation for heavy metal contaminated sites in the South Pacific: strategies, current challenges and future prospects
    Diarra, Ivan
    Kotra, Krishna Kumar
    Prasad, Surendra
    [J]. APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY REVIEWS, 2022, 57 (06) : 490 - 512
  • [14] Duncan W.FA., 2010, LONG TERM OPERATION
  • [15] Fetter C.W., 2018, Contaminant hydrogeology, V3rd
  • [16] Contaminant Removal Processes in Subsurface-Flow Constructed Wetlands: A Review
    Garcia, Joan
    Rousseau, Diederik P. L.
    Morato, Jordi
    Lesage, Els
    Matamoros, Victor
    Bayona, Josep M.
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 40 (07) : 561 - 661
  • [17] Test of the first-order removal model for metal retention in a young constructed wetland
    Goulet, RR
    Pick, FR
    Droste, RL
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 17 (04) : 357 - 371
  • [18] Henke K.R., 2009, Arsenic, P351
  • [19] Henke K.R., 2009, Arsenic Environmental Chemistry, Health Threats and Waste Treatment, P40
  • [20] Hoover KL, 1998, PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN POWER CONFERENCE, VOL. 60, PTS I & II, P556