Thinking systemically about climate services: Using archetypes to reveal maladaptation

Developing and implementing climate adaptation measures in complex socio-ecological systems can lead to unintended consequences, especially when those systems are undergoing rapid hydro -climatic and socioeconomic change. In these dynamic contexts, a systemic approach can make the difference between adaptive and maladaptive outcomes. This paper focuses on the use of climate services, often touted as no -regret solutions, and their potential to generate maladaptation. We explored the interactions between climate services and adaptation/maladaptation across five case studies affected by different types of natural hazards and characterized by a range of hydro -climatic and socio-economic conditions. Using system archetypes, we show how climate services can play a role in both producing and preventing maladaptation. The dynamics explored through system archetypes are: i) "fixes that fail", where short-sighted solutions fail to address the root causes of a problem; ii) "band aid solutions", where the benefits brought about in the short-term come at the expenses of delaying longterm adaptive actions; and iii) "success to the successful", where some groups increasingly benefit from climate services at the expenses of other groups. We demonstrate how these dynamics constitute maladaptive processes, as well as identifying the tools and theories that can be used in this type of assessment. Finally, we provide a framework and recommendations to guide the ex -ante assessment of maladaptation risk when designing and implementing climate services.