Effects of Postoperative Gum Chewing on Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function Following Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:2
|
作者
Tuscharoenporn, Thunwipa [1 ]
Uruwankul, Kittithat [2 ]
Charoenkwan, Kittipat [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
关键词
gum chewing; gynecology; laparoscopy; ENHANCED RECOVERY; BOWEL MOTILITY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13102851
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Chewing gum, considered a form of sham feeding, has been shown to improve intestinal motor and secretory function in various types of abdominal surgery. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the effects of postoperative gum chewing on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature review of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Embase, and a reference list of relevant studies from the inception to 11 March 2024, comparing postoperative gum chewing versus no gum chewing following laparoscopic gynecologic surgery regardless of indications and setting without language restriction. The primary outcome was the time to the presence of bowel sounds and the time to the first passage of flatus. Cochrane's risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. Results: Nine RCTs with a total of 1011 patients were included. Overall, three studies were categorized as having a low risk of bias, three had some concerns, and three exhibited a high risk of bias. The time to the presence of bowel sounds (mean difference [MD] -2.66 h, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.68 to -1.64, p < 0.00001) and time to the first passage of flatus (MD -4.20 h, 95% CI -5.79 to -2.61, p < 0.00001) was significantly shorter in the gum-chewing group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups with regard to the time to the first defecation (MD -6.52 h, 95% CI -15.70 to 2.66, p = 0.16), time to the first postoperative mobilization (MD 24.05 min, 95% CI -38.16 to 86.26, p = 0.45), postoperative ileus (MD 0.68, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.19, p = 0.17), and length of hospital stay (MD -0.05 day, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.04, p = 0.28). Conclusions: Gum chewing following laparoscopic gynecologic surgery appears to promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function, as evidenced by a reduced time to the presence of bowel sounds and the first passage of flatus.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Preoperative carbohydrate loading before colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lu, Justin
    Khamar, Jigish
    McKechnie, Tyler
    Lee, Yung
    Amin, Nalin
    Hong, Dennis
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (12) : 2431 - 2450
  • [42] Iatrogenic bladder injury following gynecologic and obstetric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jensen, Ann-Sophie
    Heinemeier, Ina Isabell Kathleen
    Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou
    Rudnicki, Martin
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 (12) : 1608 - 1617
  • [43] Sham feed or sham? A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of gum chewing on gut function after elective colorectal surgery
    Craig N. Parnaby
    Alisdair J. MacDonald
    John T. Jenkins
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009, 24 : 585 - 592
  • [44] Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist in Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chen, Innie
    Motan, Tarek
    Kiddoo, Darcie
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 18 (03) : 303 - 309
  • [45] Sham feed or sham? A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of gum chewing on gut function after elective colorectal surgery
    Parnaby, Craig N.
    MacDonald, Alisdair J.
    Jenkins, John T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (05) : 585 - 592
  • [46] Goal-directed fluid therapy does not reduce postoperative ileus in gastrointestinal surgery A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Xiongxin
    Zheng, Wei
    Chen, Chaoqin
    Kang, Xianhui
    Zheng, Yueying
    Bao, Fangping
    Gan, Shuyuan
    Zhu, Shengmei
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (45)
  • [47] Does chewing gum improve postoperative results in patients undergoing radical cystectomy? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis
    Ziouziou, I.
    Ammani, A.
    Karmouni, T.
    El Khader, K.
    Koutani, A.
    Andaloussi, A. Iben Attya
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2017, 27 (10): : 513 - 520
  • [48] Efficacy of fast track surgery in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Qing
    Ding, Li
    Jiang, Honglei
    Zhang, Chundong
    Jin, Junzhe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 50 : 28 - 34
  • [49] A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Investigating Methods of Postoperative Void Trials Following Benign Gynecologic and Urogynecologic Surgeries
    Dieter, Alexis A.
    Conklin, Jamie L.
    Willis-Gray, Marcella G.
    Desai, Shivani
    Grant, Megan
    Bradley, Megan S.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : 1160 - +
  • [50] Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wilson, Alyssa A.
    Schmid, Alexis M.
    Pestana Jr, Pedro
    Tubog, Tito D.
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2024, 39 (01) : 122 - 131