Evaluation of subgrid-scale models in decaying rotating stratified turbulence

被引:0
作者
Jadhav, Kiran [1 ]
Agrawal, Rahul [2 ]
Chandy, Abhilash J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Palo Alto, CA USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Turbulence; LES; rotating and stratified flows; SGS models; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; HELICITY; LES;
D O I
10.1080/14685248.2024.2367507
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The results of large eddy simulation (LES) using four sub-grid scale (SGS) models, namely: constant coefficient Smagorinsky (CS), dynamic Smagorinsky (DS), a dynamic Clark (DC) model, and dynamic Lund-Novikov II-term model (DLN2M) for rotating stratified turbulence in the absence of forcing using large-scale isotropic initial conditions, are reported here. Three cases with varying ratios of Brunt-Vaisala frequency to the inertial wave frequency, N/f, have been chosen to evaluate the performance of SGS models. The Reynolds number and N/f are chosen as (a) Case 1: Re=3704, N/f = 5 , (b) Case 2: Re=6667, N/f = 40 and (c) Case 3: Re=6667, N/f = 138 . Various quantities including turbulent kinetic energy (tke), turbulent potential energy (tpe), total dissipation, potential and total energy spectra, and their fluxes, are analyzed. It is observed that the increase in the value of N/f leads to increased oscillations in the evolution of kinetic and potential energy. Our results suggest that the inclusion of the rotation rate tensor in SGS modeling leads to overall improvements in energy evolution predictions. The CS model produces the largest errors, while the DS and the DC models are more comparable to each other. Spectral analysis of total energy and their fluxes shows that the CS, DS and DC models can reasonably predict the large-scale motion (kappa < 10 ), while the DLN2M model improves the energy prediction in the wavenumber range (10 < kappa < 64 ) in comparison to other SGS models.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 245
页数:21
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Non-Boussinesq subgrid-scale model with dynamic tensorial coefficients [J].
Agrawal, Rahul ;
Whitmore, Michael P. ;
Griffin, Kevin P. ;
Bose, Sanjeeb T. ;
Moin, Parviz .
PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2022, 7 (07)
[2]   Large eddy simulations of forced and stably stratified turbulence: Evolution, spectra, scaling, structures and shear [J].
Agrawal, Rahul ;
Chandy, Abhilash J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2021, 89
[3]   Effects of the similarity model in finite-difference LES of isotropic turbulence using a Lagrangian dynamic mixed model [J].
Anderson, R ;
Meneveau, C .
FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 1999, 62 (03) :201-225
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ANNU REV FLUID MECH, DOI DOI 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-014556
[5]   COHERENT STRUCTURES IN ROTATING 3-DIMENSIONAL TURBULENCE [J].
BARTELLO, P ;
METAIS, O ;
LESIEUR, M .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1994, 273 :1-29
[6]   Single-particle Lagrangian statistics from direct numerical simulations of rotating-stratified turbulence [J].
Buaria, D. ;
Pumir, A. ;
Feraco, F. ;
Marino, R. ;
Pouquet, A. ;
Rosenberg, D. ;
Primavera, L. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2020, 5 (06)
[7]   Turbulent diffusion in rapidly rotating flows with and without stable stratification [J].
Cambon, C ;
Godeferd, FS ;
Nicolleau, FCGA ;
Vassilicos, JC .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2004, 499 :231-255
[8]   Turbulence and vortex structures in rotating and stratified flows [J].
Cambon, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS, 2001, 20 (04) :489-510
[9]   Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman's estimates revisited [J].
Choi, Haecheon ;
Moin, Parviz .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2012, 24 (01)
[10]   EVALUATION OF SUB-GRID-SCALE MODELS USING AN ACCURATELY SIMULATED TURBULENT-FLOW [J].
CLARK, RA ;
FERZIGER, JH ;
REYNOLDS, WC .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1979, 91 (MAR) :1-16