Comparing Postoperative Pain With Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

被引:2
|
作者
Nilsson, Wesley [1 ,5 ]
Schmidt, Megan [2 ]
Turner, Lindsay [3 ,4 ]
Shepherd, Jonathan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UConn Hlth John Dempsy Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg, Farmington, CT USA
[2] Trinity Hlth New England, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Hartford, CT USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Res Inst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol,Allegheny Hlth Network, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Res Inst, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Urogynecol & Pelv Reconstruct Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] UConn Hlth John Dempsy Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
关键词
Minimally invasive; Laparoscopy; Robotic; Pelvic organ prolapse; Pain; Sacrocolpopexy; HYSTERECTOMY; INFILTRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2023.11.016
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare postoperative pain and pain-related outcomes after laparoscopic (LS-MISC) vs robotic minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (R-MISC). Design: A secondary analysis of an original placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining preoperative intravenous (IV) acetaminophen on postoperative pain after MISC. Setting: Planned secondary analysis of multicenter RCT. Patients: Women undergoing MISC. Interventions: Coprimary outcomes at 24 hours were total opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores comparing LS-MISC and R-MISC. The secondary outcome was pain scores using a pain diary through 7 days after the procedure. Measurements and Main Results: The original study was a double-blind, multicenter, RCT comparing IV acetaminophen with placebo that took place between 2014 and 2017. Given that the original trial was unable to show an impact from the use of IV acetaminophen, our analysis focused on the impact of surgical modality. We included 90 subjects undergoing MISC: 65 LS-MISC and 25 R-MISC. Most were Caucasian (97.8%) and postmenopausal (88.9%) with mean age of 61.2 +/- 7.2 years and body mass index of 27.6 +/- 4.4 kg/m(2). IV acetaminophen did not affect pain in the original study and was not different between LS-MISC and R-MISC. Concomitant hysterectomy was performed in 67% (LS-MISC) vs 60% (R-MISC, p = .49). LS-MISC underwent more perineorrhaphies (15.4% vs 0%, p = .04) and posterior repairs (18.5% vs 0%, p = .02). Operative time was longer with LS-MISC (208.5 +/- 57.3 vs 143.6 +/- 21.0 minutes, p <.01). Length of stay was longer with LS-MISC (0.9 +/- 0.4 vs 0.7 +/- 0.4 days, p = .02). Women undergoing LS-MISC consumed more opioid MMEs through 24 hours when including intraoperative opioids (48.5 +/- 25.5 vs 35.1 +/- 14.6 MME, p <.01). Using linear regression correcting for operative time and concomitant vaginal repairs, this difference disappeared. Likewise, when intraoperative opioids were excluded, there was no difference. There were no differences in 24-hour postoperative VAS scores, opioid use in the first week, or quality of life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pain Interference Short Form, all p <.05). Conclusion: When comparing VAS pain scores, MME opioid usage, and quality of life between LS-MISC and R-MISC, either there was no difference or differences disappeared after adjusting for confounders. Overall, opioid use, pain scores, and opioid side effects were low.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 204
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Conversion rate of laparoscopic or robotic to open sacrocolpopexy: are there associated factors and complications?
    Capmas, Perrine
    Suarthana, Eva
    Larouche, Maryse
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (08) : 2249 - 2256
  • [22] Comparative Perioperative Pain and Recovery in Women Undergoing Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
    Westermann, Lauren B.
    Crisp, Catrina C.
    Mazloomdoost, Donna
    Kleeman, Steven D.
    Pauls, Rachel N.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 23 (02): : 95 - 100
  • [23] Comparison of postoperative pain in robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Wu, Ya-Chu
    Hong, Mun-Kung
    Ding, Dah-Ching
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [24] Robotic sacrocolpopexy: a game worth playing? A critical literature analysis
    Jamaleddine, Hussein Mansour
    Khalil, Nour
    Aoun, Rana
    Atallah, David
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2025, 12
  • [25] Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: a case-control study
    Cucinella, G.
    Calagna, G.
    Romano, G.
    Di Buono, G.
    Gugliotta, G.
    Saitta, S.
    Adile, G.
    Manzone, M.
    Accardi, G.
    Perino, A.
    Agrusa, A.
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2016, 37 (03): : 113 - 117
  • [26] Cost-Minimization Analysis of Robotic-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy
    Judd, John P.
    Siddiqui, Nazema Y.
    Barnett, Jason C.
    Visco, Anthony G.
    Hayrilesky, Laura J.
    Wu, Jennifer M.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (04) : 493 - 499
  • [27] Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy
    Oh, Sumin
    Shin, Jung-Ho
    OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE, 2023, 66 (06) : 509 - 517
  • [28] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse repair: A retrospective cohort study
    Cho, Eun Hye
    Shin, Eun Seo
    Kim, Sung Yob
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 78
  • [29] Assessing the Content and Readability of Robotic and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Information Online
    Lim, Remington
    Wang, Joanna C.
    Wang, Liz B.
    Ng, Linda
    Wason, Shaun E.
    Wang, David S.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (06): : E201 - E204
  • [30] Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy
    Kilic, Gokhan Sami
    Lee, Toy
    Lewis, Kelsey
    Demirkiran, Cem
    Dursun, Furkan
    Unlu, Bekir Serdar
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 41 (04) : 651 - 654