Comparing Postoperative Pain With Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

被引:2
|
作者
Nilsson, Wesley [1 ,5 ]
Schmidt, Megan [2 ]
Turner, Lindsay [3 ,4 ]
Shepherd, Jonathan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UConn Hlth John Dempsy Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg, Farmington, CT USA
[2] Trinity Hlth New England, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Hartford, CT USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Res Inst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol,Allegheny Hlth Network, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Res Inst, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Urogynecol & Pelv Reconstruct Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] UConn Hlth John Dempsy Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
关键词
Minimally invasive; Laparoscopy; Robotic; Pelvic organ prolapse; Pain; Sacrocolpopexy; HYSTERECTOMY; INFILTRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2023.11.016
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare postoperative pain and pain-related outcomes after laparoscopic (LS-MISC) vs robotic minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (R-MISC). Design: A secondary analysis of an original placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining preoperative intravenous (IV) acetaminophen on postoperative pain after MISC. Setting: Planned secondary analysis of multicenter RCT. Patients: Women undergoing MISC. Interventions: Coprimary outcomes at 24 hours were total opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores comparing LS-MISC and R-MISC. The secondary outcome was pain scores using a pain diary through 7 days after the procedure. Measurements and Main Results: The original study was a double-blind, multicenter, RCT comparing IV acetaminophen with placebo that took place between 2014 and 2017. Given that the original trial was unable to show an impact from the use of IV acetaminophen, our analysis focused on the impact of surgical modality. We included 90 subjects undergoing MISC: 65 LS-MISC and 25 R-MISC. Most were Caucasian (97.8%) and postmenopausal (88.9%) with mean age of 61.2 +/- 7.2 years and body mass index of 27.6 +/- 4.4 kg/m(2). IV acetaminophen did not affect pain in the original study and was not different between LS-MISC and R-MISC. Concomitant hysterectomy was performed in 67% (LS-MISC) vs 60% (R-MISC, p = .49). LS-MISC underwent more perineorrhaphies (15.4% vs 0%, p = .04) and posterior repairs (18.5% vs 0%, p = .02). Operative time was longer with LS-MISC (208.5 +/- 57.3 vs 143.6 +/- 21.0 minutes, p <.01). Length of stay was longer with LS-MISC (0.9 +/- 0.4 vs 0.7 +/- 0.4 days, p = .02). Women undergoing LS-MISC consumed more opioid MMEs through 24 hours when including intraoperative opioids (48.5 +/- 25.5 vs 35.1 +/- 14.6 MME, p <.01). Using linear regression correcting for operative time and concomitant vaginal repairs, this difference disappeared. Likewise, when intraoperative opioids were excluded, there was no difference. There were no differences in 24-hour postoperative VAS scores, opioid use in the first week, or quality of life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pain Interference Short Form, all p <.05). Conclusion: When comparing VAS pain scores, MME opioid usage, and quality of life between LS-MISC and R-MISC, either there was no difference or differences disappeared after adjusting for confounders. Overall, opioid use, pain scores, and opioid side effects were low.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 204
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy
    Alexandra Dubinskaya
    Diego Hernandez-Aranda
    Dorothy B. Wakefield
    Jonathan P. Shepherd
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 : 401 - 407
  • [2] Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy
    Dubinskaya, Alexandra
    Hernandez-Aranda, Diego
    Wakefield, Dorothy B.
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (02) : 401 - 407
  • [3] Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Outcomes and Costs
    Richter, Lee A.
    Park, Amy J.
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 3 (04): : 265 - 269
  • [4] Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Outcomes and Costs
    Lee A. Richter
    Amy J. Park
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2014, 3 (4) : 265 - 269
  • [5] Analysis of postoperative pain in robotic versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Betcher R.E.
    Chaney J.P.
    Lacy P.R.
    Otey S.K.
    Wood D.J.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2014, 8 (1) : 35 - 41
  • [6] Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
    Chang, Chia-Lun
    Chen, Chun-Hua
    Chang, Shang-Jen
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (02) : 297 - 308
  • [7] Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
    Chia-Lun Chang
    Chun-Hua Chen
    Shang-Jen Chang
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 297 - 308
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review
    Callewaert, Geertje
    Bosteels, Jan
    Housmans, Susanne
    Verguts, Jasper
    Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben
    Van der Aa, Frank
    De Ridder, Dirk
    Vergote, Ignace
    Deprest, Jan
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2016, 13 (02) : 115 - 123
  • [9] Update on Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Outcomes and Costs
    Jennifer L. Hallock
    Jocelyn Fitzgerald
    Chi Chiung Grace Chen
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2014, 3 (4) : 252 - 264
  • [10] Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Comparing Operative Times, Costs and Outcomes
    Tan-Kim, Jasmine
    Menefee, Shawn A.
    Luber, Karl M.
    Nager, Charles W.
    Lukacz, Emily S.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 17 (01): : 44 - 49