Energy quota trading policy and energy efficiency: The role of government supervision and public participation

被引:10
作者
Li, Ge [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoyu [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Donghua Univ, Glorious Sun Sch Business & Management, Shanghai 200051, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Zhejiang Eight Eight Strategy, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy quota trading; Energy efficiency; Government supervision; Public participation; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; CHINA; ECONOMICS; GAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123565
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Unlike carbon emissions trading based on end-of-pipe regulation, the Energy Quota Trading (EQT) policy represents a market-oriented environmental regulation rooted in source control. However, its effectiveness on energy efficiency remains to be scrutinized. Using the panel data of 269 cities in China from 2011 to 2021, we employ the difference-in-differences method to examine whether and how the EQT policy impacts energy efficiency. Our results reveal that the EQT policy can significantly enhance green total factor energy efficiency. Mechanism analysis indicates that this promotion is primarily achieved by fostering green technology innovation and facilitating industrial structure upgrading. Further investigations explore the moderating role of external supervision, demonstrating that government supervision and public participation can amplify the EQT policy's efficacy in promoting energy efficiency. This underscores the complementary role of governmental and public in bolstering the utility of market-oriented incentives. Additionally, we identify significant heterogeneity in EQT policy effects across cities with varying geographical locations and development strategies. Our research offers critical insights into the adoption of source-control environmental regulations for developing countries.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Financial development and environmental degradation: Does political regime matter?
    Adams, Samuel
    Klobodu, Edem Kwame Mensah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 1472 - 1479
  • [2] Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on economic growth of BRICS countries: A fixed effect panel quantile regression analysis
    Akram, Rabia
    Chen, Fuzhong
    Khalid, Fahad
    Huang, Guanhua
    Irfan, Muhammad
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 215
  • [3] Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions: Evidence from developing countries
    Akram, Rabia
    Chen, Fuzhong
    Khalid, Fahad
    Ye, Zhiwei
    Majeed, Muhammad Tariq
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 247 (247)
  • [4] Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model
    Bi, Gong-Bing
    Song, Wen
    Zhou, P.
    Liang, Liang
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 66 : 537 - 546
  • [5] Prices, technology development and the rebound effect
    Birol, F
    Keppler, JH
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) : 457 - 469
  • [6] Efficacy of Command-and-Control and Market-Based Environmental Regulation in Developing Countries
    Blackman, Allen
    Li, Zhengyan
    Liu, Antung A.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 10, 2018, 10 : 381 - 404
  • [7] Does green investment improve energy firm performance?
    Chen, Yufeng
    Ma, Yanbai
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 153
  • [8] Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China
    Chen, Zhongfei
    Zhang, Xiao
    Chen, Fanglin
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 168
  • [9] Can energy quota trading reduce carbon intensity in China? A study using a DEA and decomposition approach
    Chu, Xiaoxiao
    Du, Gang
    Geng, Hong
    Liu, Xiao
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 28 : 1275 - 1285
  • [10] Effectiveness of pilot carbon emissions trading systems in China
    Deng, Zhe
    Li, Dongya
    Pang, Tao
    Duan, Maosheng
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2018, 18 (08) : 992 - 1011