Insurance Denials and Patient Treatment in a Large Academic Radiation Oncology Center

被引:1
作者
Shin, Jacob Y. [1 ]
Chino, Fumiko [1 ]
Cuaron, John J. [1 ]
Washington, Charles [1 ]
Jablonowski, Margaret [2 ]
McBride, Sean [1 ]
Gomez, Daniel R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Phys Billing Dept, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CELL LUNG-CANCER; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY; OPEN-LABEL; THERAPY; CARCINOMA; TOXICITY; OUTCOMES; IMRT; HEAD; NECK;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.16359
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Insurance barriers to cancer care can cause significant patient and clinician burden. Objective To investigate the association of insurance denial with changes in technique, dose, and time to delivery of radiation oncology treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants In this single-institution cohort analysis, data were collected from patients with payer-denied authorization for radiation therapy (RT) from November 1, 2021, to December 8, 2022. Data were analyzed from December 15, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Exposure Insurance denial for RT. Main Outcomes and Measures Association of these denials with changes in RT technique, dose, and time to treatment delivery was assessed using chi(2) tests. Results A total of 206 cases (118 women [57.3%]; median age, 58 [range, 26-91] years) were identified. Most insurers (199 [96.6%]) were commercial payers, while 7 (3.4%) were Medicare or Medicare Advantage. One hundred sixty-one patients (78.2%) were younger than 65 years. Of 206 cases, 127 (61.7%) were ultimately authorized without any change to the requested RT technique or prescription dose; 56 (27.2%) were authorized after modification to RT technique and/or prescription dose required by the payer. Of 21 cases with required prescription dose change, the median decrease in dose was 24.0 (range, 2.3-51.0) Gy. Of 202 cases (98.1%) with RT delivered, 72 (34.9%) were delayed for a mean (SD) of 7.8 (9.1) days and median of 5 (range, 1-49) days. Four cases (1.9%) ultimately did not receive any authorization, with 3 (1.5%) not undergoing RT, and 1 (0.5%) seeking treatment at another institution. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patients with payer-denied cases, most insurance denials in radiation oncology were ultimately approved on appeal; however, RT technique and/or effectiveness may be compromised by payer-mandated changes. Further investigation and action to recognize the time and financial burdens on clinicians and clinical effects on patients caused by insurance denials of RT is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] American Cancer Society, If your health insurance claim is denied
  • [2] American Cancer Society, Getting medical pre-approval or prior authorization
  • [3] American Society for Radiation Oncology, Process of care
  • [4] American Society for Radiation Oncology, 2022, ASTRO applauds House passage of bipartisan bill to reduce prior authorization burden and treatment delays
  • [5] American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022, ASCO LAUNCH CAMP URG
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2022, 117th Congress
  • [7] Estimating the Practice-Level and National Cost Burden of Treatment-Related Prior Authorization for Academic Radiation Oncology Practices
    Bingham, Brian
    Chennupati, Sai
    Osmundson, Evan C.
    [J]. JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 18 (06) : 458 - +
  • [8] Comparison of toxicity after IMRT and 3D-conformal radiotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer - A systematic review
    Bittner, Martin-Immanuel
    Grosu, Anca-Ligia
    Brunner, Thomas B.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 114 (01) : 117 - 121
  • [9] Advances in radiation therapy: Conventional to 3D, to IMRT, to 4D, and beyond
    Bucci, MK
    Bevan, A
    Roach, M
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2005, 55 (02) : 117 - 134
  • [10] Chmura SJ, 2022, J CLIN ONCOL, V40