Perceptions of infection control professionals toward electronic surveillance software supporting inpatient infections: A mixed methods study

Background: Electronic surveillance software (ESS) collects multiple patient data from hospital software to assist infection control professionals in the prevention and control of hospital -associated infections. This study aimed to understand the perceptions of end users (i.e., infection control professionals) and the facilitators and barriers related to a commercial ESS named ZINC and to assess its usability. Methods: A mixed -method research approach was adopted among infection control professionals 10 months after the implementation of commercial ESS in the university hospital of Nancy, France. A qualitative analysis based on individual semistructured interviews was conducted to collect professionals' perceptions of ESS and to understand barriers and facilitators. Qualitative data were systematically coded and thematically analyzed. A quantitative analysis was performed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: Thirteen infection control professionals were included. Qualitative analysis revealed technical, organizational and human barriers to the installation and use stages and five significant facilitators: the relevant design of the ESS, the improvement of infection prevention and control practices, the designation of a champion/ superuser among professionals, training, and collaboration with the developer team. Quantitative analysis indicated that the evaluated ESS was a "good" system in terms of perceived ease of use, with an overall median SUS score of 85/100. Conclusions: This study shows the value of ESS to support inpatient infections as perceived by infection control professionals. It reveals barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of ESS. These barriers and facilitators should be considered to facilitate the installation of the software in other hospitals.