Clinical implementation and evaluation of deep learning-assisted automatic radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer

被引:0
作者
Wang, Ningyu [1 ]
Fan, Jiawei [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Xu, Yingjie [1 ]
Yan, Lingling [1 ]
Chen, Deqi [1 ]
Wang, Wenqing [1 ]
Men, Kuo [1 ]
Dai, Jianrong [1 ]
Liu, Zhiqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Clin Res Ctr Radiat Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Key Lab Radiat Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 124卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Automatic planning; Deep learning; VMAT; Expert review; Lung cancer; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSE PREDICTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104492
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate the clinical application of deep learning (DL)-assisted automatic radiotherapy planning for lung cancer. Methods: A DL model was developed for predicting patient-specific doses, trained and validated on a dataset of 235 patients with diverse target volumes and prescriptions. The model was integrated into clinical workflow with DL-predicted objective functions. The automatic plans were retrospectively designed for additional 50 treated manual volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. A comparison was made between automatic and manual plans in terms of dosimetric indexes, monitor units (MUs) and planning time. Plan quality metric (PQM) encompassing these indexes was evaluated, with higher PQM values indicating superior plan quality. Qualitative evaluations of two plans were conducted by four reviewers. Results: The PQM score was 40.7 f 13.1 for manual plans and 40.8 f 13.5 for automatic plans (P = 0.75). Compared to manual plans, the targets coverage and homogeneity of automatic plans demonstrated no significant difference. Manual plans exhibited better sparing for lung in V5 (difference: 1.8 f 4.2 %, P = 0.02), whereas automatic plans showed enhanced sparing for heart in V30 (difference: 1.4 f 4.7 %, P = 0.02) and for spinal cord in Dmax (difference: 0.7 f 4.7 Gy, P = 0.04). The planning time and MUs of automatic plans were significantly reduced by 70.5 f 20.0 min and 97.4 f 82.1. Automatic plans were deemed acceptable in 88 % of the reviews (176/200). Conclusions: The DL-assisted approach for lung cancer notably decreased planning time and MUs, while demonstrating comparable or superior quality relative to manual plans. It has the potential to provide benefit to lung cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Knowledge-based versus deep learning based treatment planning for breast radiotherapy
    Portik, Daniel
    Clementel, Enrico
    Krayenbuhl, Jerome
    Bakx, Nienke
    Andratschke, Nicolaus
    Hurkmans, Coen
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 29
  • [22] A Review on Application of Deep Learning Algorithms in External Beam Radiotherapy Automated Treatment Planning
    Wang, Mingqing
    Zhang, Qilin
    Lam, Saikit
    Cai, Jing
    Yang, Ruijie
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [23] Deep Learning for Automatic Identification of Nodule Morphology Features and Prediction of Lung Cancer
    Wang, Weilun
    Chakraborty, Goutam
    2019 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AWARENESS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICAST 2019), 2019, : 539 - 544
  • [24] Comprehensive clinical evaluation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer
    Chung, Seung Yeun
    Chang, Jee Suk
    Kim, Yong Bae
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [25] What margins should be added to the clinical target volume in radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer?
    Ekberg, L
    Holmberg, O
    Wittgren, L
    Bjelkengren, G
    Landberg, T
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 48 (01) : 71 - 77
  • [26] Clinical implementation of automated treatment planning for whole-brain radiotherapy
    Han, Eun Young
    Cardenas, Carlos E.
    Nguyen, Callistus
    Hancock, Donald
    Xiao, Yao
    Mumme, Raymond
    Court, Laurence E.
    Rhee, Dong Joo
    Netherton, Tucker J.
    Li, Jing
    Yeboa, Debra Nana
    Wang, Chenyang
    Briere, Tina M.
    Balter, Peter
    Martel, Mary K.
    Wen, Zhifei
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (09): : 94 - 102
  • [27] Evaluation of Automated Treatment Planning and Organ Dose Prediction for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Ouyang, Zi
    Zhuang, Tingliang
    Marwaha, Gaurav
    Kolar, Matthew D.
    Qi, Peng
    Videtic, Gregory M.
    Stephans, Kevin L.
    Xia, Ping
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [28] Deep Learning-Assisted Beamforming Design and BER Evaluation in Multi-User Downlink Systems
    Kim, Junbeom
    Lee, Hoon
    Hong, Seung-Eun
    Park, Seok-Hwan
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS AND FUTURE NETWORKS (ICUFN 2021), 2021, : 319 - 321
  • [29] Implementation and evaluation of an intelligent automatic treatment planning robot for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Gao, Yin
    Shen, Chenyang
    Jia, Xun
    Park, Yang Kyun
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 184
  • [30] Validation of a Fully Automated Hybrid Deep Learning Cardiac Substructure Segmentation Tool for Contouring and Dose Evaluation in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy
    Chin, V.
    Finnegan, R. N.
    Chlapy, P.
    Otton, J.
    Haidar, A.
    Holloway, L.
    Thwaites, D. I.
    Dowling, J.
    Delaney, G. P.
    Vinod, S. K.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 35 (06) : 370 - 381