Clinical implementation and evaluation of deep learning-assisted automatic radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Ningyu [1 ]
Fan, Jiawei [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Xu, Yingjie [1 ]
Yan, Lingling [1 ]
Chen, Deqi [1 ]
Wang, Wenqing [1 ]
Men, Kuo [1 ]
Dai, Jianrong [1 ]
Liu, Zhiqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Clin Res Ctr Radiat Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Key Lab Radiat Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 124卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Automatic planning; Deep learning; VMAT; Expert review; Lung cancer; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSE PREDICTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104492
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate the clinical application of deep learning (DL)-assisted automatic radiotherapy planning for lung cancer. Methods: A DL model was developed for predicting patient-specific doses, trained and validated on a dataset of 235 patients with diverse target volumes and prescriptions. The model was integrated into clinical workflow with DL-predicted objective functions. The automatic plans were retrospectively designed for additional 50 treated manual volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. A comparison was made between automatic and manual plans in terms of dosimetric indexes, monitor units (MUs) and planning time. Plan quality metric (PQM) encompassing these indexes was evaluated, with higher PQM values indicating superior plan quality. Qualitative evaluations of two plans were conducted by four reviewers. Results: The PQM score was 40.7 f 13.1 for manual plans and 40.8 f 13.5 for automatic plans (P = 0.75). Compared to manual plans, the targets coverage and homogeneity of automatic plans demonstrated no significant difference. Manual plans exhibited better sparing for lung in V5 (difference: 1.8 f 4.2 %, P = 0.02), whereas automatic plans showed enhanced sparing for heart in V30 (difference: 1.4 f 4.7 %, P = 0.02) and for spinal cord in Dmax (difference: 0.7 f 4.7 Gy, P = 0.04). The planning time and MUs of automatic plans were significantly reduced by 70.5 f 20.0 min and 97.4 f 82.1. Automatic plans were deemed acceptable in 88 % of the reviews (176/200). Conclusions: The DL-assisted approach for lung cancer notably decreased planning time and MUs, while demonstrating comparable or superior quality relative to manual plans. It has the potential to provide benefit to lung cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep learning-assisted fully automatic fiber tracking for tremor treatment
    Haensch, Annika
    Jenne, Juergen W.
    Upadhyay, Neeraj
    Schmeel, Carsten
    Purrer, Veronika
    Wuellner, Ullrich
    Klein, Jan
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2022, 12034
  • [2] Evaluation of a clinically introduced deep learning model for radiotherapy treatment planning of breast cancer
    Bakx, Nienke
    van der Sangen, Maurice
    Theuws, Jacqueline
    Bluemink, Johanna
    Hurkmans, Coen
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 28
  • [3] Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning
    Zeverino, Michele
    Piccolo, Consiglia
    Wuethrich, Diana
    Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy
    Marguet, Maud
    Bourhis, Jean
    Bochud, Francois
    Moeckli, Raphael
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 28
  • [4] Review of Deep Learning Based Automatic Segmentation for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy
    Liu, Xi
    Li, Kai-Wen
    Yang, Ruijie
    Geng, Li-Sheng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [5] Deep learning driven predictive treatment planning for adaptive radiotherapy of lung cancer
    Lee, Donghoon
    Hu, Yu-chi
    Kuo, Licheng
    Alam, Sadegh
    Yorke, Ellen
    Li, Anyi
    Rimner, Andreas
    Zhang, Pengpeng
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 169 : 57 - 63
  • [6] An ensemble reinforcement learning-assisted deep learning framework for enhanced lung cancer diagnosis
    Jain, Richa
    Singh, Parminder
    Kaur, Avinash
    SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2024, 91
  • [7] Dose prediction via deep learning to enhance treatment planning of lung radiotherapy including simultaneous integrated boost techniques
    Cao, Wenhua
    Gronberg, Mary
    Bilton, Stephen
    Baroudi, Hana
    Gay, Skylar
    Peeler, Christopher
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Whitaker, Thomas J.
    Hoffman, Karen
    Court, Laurence E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025,
  • [8] Clinical evaluation of atlas and deep learning based automatic contouring for lung cancer
    Lustberg, Tim
    van Soest, Johan
    Gooding, Mark
    Peressutti, Devis
    Aljabar, Paul
    van der Stoep, Judith
    van Elmpt, Wouter
    Dekker, Andre
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 126 (02) : 312 - 317
  • [9] The Implementation of an Advanced Treatment Planning Algorithm in the Treatment of Lung Cancer with Conventional Radiotherapy
    Pearson, M.
    Atherton, P.
    McMenemin, R.
    McDonald, F.
    Mazdai, G.
    Mulvenna, P.
    Lambert, G.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 21 (03) : 168 - 174
  • [10] Deep learning-assisted interactive contouring of lung cancer: Impact on contouring time and consistency
    Trimpl, Michael J.
    Campbell, Sorcha
    Panakis, Niki
    Ajzensztejn, Daniel
    Burke, Emma
    Ellis, Shawn
    Johnstone, Philippa
    Doyle, Emma
    Towers, Rebecca
    Higgins, Geoffrey
    Bernard, Claire
    Hustinx, Roland
    Vallis, Katherine A.
    Stride, Eleanor P. J.
    Gooding, Mark J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 200