The Interplay of Binary and Quantitative Structure on the Stability of Mutualistic Networks

被引:0
作者
Anderson, Christopher R. [1 ]
Curtsdotter, Alva R. K. [2 ,3 ]
Staniczenko, Phillip P. A. [4 ]
Valdovinos, Fernanda S. [5 ]
Brosi, Berry J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, 3747 W Stevens Way NE, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ New England, Insect Ecol Lab, Zool, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
[3] EkoMod SpA, Comuna De Concon 2510000, Valparaiso, Chile
[4] CUNY, Brooklyn Coll, Dept Biol, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Washington, DC 98195 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SPECIES INTERACTIONS; BIODIVERSITY; ARCHITECTURE; NESTEDNESS; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1093/icb/icae074
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Understanding how the structure of biological systems impacts their resilience (broadly defined) is a recurring question across multiple levels of biological organization. In ecology, considerable effort has been devoted to understanding how the structure of interactions between species in ecological networks is linked to different broad resilience outcomes, especially local stability. Still, nearly all of that work has focused on interaction structure in presence-absence terms and has not investigated quantitative structure, i.e., the arrangement of interaction strengths in ecological networks. We investigated how the interplay between binary and quantitative structure impacts stability in mutualistic interaction networks (those in which species interactions are mutually beneficial), using community matrix approaches. We additionally examined the effects of network complexity and within-guild competition for context. In terms of structure, we focused on understanding the stability impacts of nestedness, a structure in which more-specialized species interact with smaller subsets of the same species that more-generalized species interact with. Most mutualistic networks in nature display binary nestedness, which is puzzling because both binary and quantitative nestedness are known to be destabilizing on their own. We found that quantitative network structure has important consequences for local stability. In more-complex networks, binary-nested structures were the most stable configurations, depending on the quantitative structures, but which quantitative structure was stabilizing depended on network complexity and competitive context. As complexity increases and in the absence of within-guild competition, the most stable configurations have a nested binary structure with a complementary (i.e., anti-nested) quantitative structure. In the presence of within-guild competition, however, the most stable networks are those with a nested binary structure and a nested quantitative structure. In other words, the impact of interaction overlap on community persistence is dependent on the competitive context. These results help to explain the prevalence of binary-nested structures in nature and underscore the need for future empirical work on quantitative structure.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 840
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ranking species in mutualistic networks
    Dominguez-Garcia, Virginia
    Munoz, Miguel A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [42] Do bipartite binary antagonistic and mutualistic networks have different responses to the taxonomic resolution of nodes?
    Rodrigues, Barbara Nobrega
    Boscolo, Danilo
    ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2020, 45 (03) : 709 - 717
  • [43] Co-adaptation enhances the resilience of mutualistic networks
    Zhang, Huixin
    Liu, Xueming
    Wang, Qi
    Zhang, Weidong
    Gao, Jianxi
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2020, 17 (168)
  • [44] A SIMPLE AND BOUNDED MODEL OF POPULATION DYNAMICS FOR MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS
    Manuel Pastor, Juan
    Garcia-Algarra, Javier
    Galeano, Javier
    Maria Iriondo, Jose
    Ramasco, Jose J.
    NETWORKS AND HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA, 2015, 10 (01) : 53 - 70
  • [45] Phenology drives mutualistic network structure and diversity
    Encinas-Viso, Francisco
    Revilla, Tomas A.
    Etienne, Rampal S.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 15 (03) : 198 - 208
  • [46] Why nestedness in mutualistic networks?
    Burgos, Enrique
    Ceva, Horacio
    Perazzo, Roberto P. J.
    Devoto, Mariano
    Medan, Diego
    Zimmermann, Martin
    Delbue, Ana Maria
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 249 (02) : 307 - 313
  • [47] Ecological Networks: Structure, Interaction Strength, and Stability
    Bhattacharyya, Samit
    Sinha, Somdatta
    DYNAMICS ON AND OF COMPLEX NETWORKS: APPLICATIONS TO BIOLOGY, COMPUTER SCIENCE, AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2009, : 57 - 72
  • [48] Coevolution by different functional mechanisms modulates the structure and dynamics of antagonistic and mutualistic networks
    de Andreazzi, Cecilia Siliansky
    Astegiano, Julia
    Guimaraes, Paulo R., Jr.
    OIKOS, 2020, 129 (02) : 224 - 237
  • [49] Unifying relationships between complexity and stability in mutualistic ecological communities
    Feng, Wenfeng
    Bailey, Richard M.
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 439 : 100 - 126
  • [50] Human Impacts and Climate Change Influence Nestedness and Modularity in Food-Web and Mutualistic Networks
    Takemoto, Kazuhiro
    Kajihara, Kosuke
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):