Improved Scoring of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised: An Item Response Theory Analysis

被引:5
作者
Bean, Christian A. L. [1 ]
Mueller, Sophia B. [1 ]
Abitante, George [1 ]
Ciesla, Jeffrey A. [2 ]
Cho, Sun-Joo [1 ]
Cole, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol & Human Dev, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, Kent, OH USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale - revised; CESD-R; Item response theory; Psychometrics; Cutoff score; Depression; CESD-R; PACKAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10862-024-10155-y
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) is a popular self-report screening measure for depression. A 20-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 4 for each item, the CESD-R can produce total scores ranging from 0 to 80. However, the typical scoring protocol for the CESD-R restricts the range of possible scores to between 0 and 60 to retain the same range and clinical cutoff scores as the original CES-D. Despite the widespread adoption of this scoring approach, the psychometric impact has never been systematically examined. In an undergraduate and community adult sample (n = 869), item response theory analyses indicated that scoring the CESD-R with all 5 response options (CESD-R5opt) provided nearly twice as much information about a person's latent depression for individuals with high levels of depression than did scoring the CESD-R with 4 response options per item (CESD-R4opt). The CESD-R5opt retained the strong reliability and factor structure of the CESD-R4opt and was more sensitive to individual differences for participants at high levels of depression compared to the CESD-R4opt. Results provide preliminary evidence that researchers and clinicians should score the CESD-R using the full 0-to-80 scale and a clinical cutoff score of 29.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 792
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
AKAIKE H, 1973, BIOMETRIKA, V60, P255, DOI 10.2307/2334537
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2022, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5TM, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[3]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1994, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890420614
[4]   AN EXAMINATION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF UNIDIMENSIONAL IRT PARAMETER ESTIMATES DERIVED FROM TWO-DIMENSIONAL DATA [J].
ANSLEY, TN ;
FORSYTH, RA .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1985, 9 (01) :37-48
[5]   Ruminative Variability Predicts Increases in Depression and Social Anxiety [J].
Bean, Christian A. L. ;
Ciesla, Jeffrey A. .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 48 (03) :511-525
[6]   Positive Interpretation Bias Predicts Longitudinal Decreases in Social Anxiety [J].
Bean, Christian A. L. ;
Everaert, Jonas ;
Ciesla, Jeffrey A. .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2023, 54 (02) :290-302
[7]  
Bean CAL, 2021, BEHAV THER, V52, P861, DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2020.10.008
[8]  
Choi SW, 2011, J STAT SOFTW, V39, P1
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[10]   The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology [J].
Cuthbert, Bruce N. .
WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 13 (01) :28-35