Political accountability and legislative behavior in Africa: evidence from the 2019 Kenyan Sugar Bill in the context of the political economy of sectoral policy

被引:1
作者
Kim, Eun Kyung [1 ]
机构
[1] Hankuk Univ Foreign Studies HUFS, Inst African Studies, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Kenya; political accountability; legislative behavior; agricultural policy; interest groups; party politics; parliamentary speech; DEMOCRACY; INSTITUTIONS; AGRICULTURE; INCENTIVES; PARLIAMENT; ELECTIONS; POSITION; BIAS; MPS;
D O I
10.1080/17531055.2024.2382385
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Recent research on African legislatures, once considered rarely autonomous, has found that some broad-scale mass movements, including pro-poor campaigns, hold legislators accountable. This article meanwhile examines the conditions under which narrow local constituency issues, shaping partisan differences, can hold relevant representatives and parties accountable while prioritizing over executive pressures and clientelist personal gains. I argue that this sort of political accountability in legislatures can be observed concerning sectoral policy interests, which, in Africa, are often geographically concentrated along ethnicity and party support lines. Drawing on a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches including interviews, news coverage reviews, and a statistical analysis of legislative debates on the 2019 Sugar Bill in Kenya, I show that the growing and collective efforts of sugar farmers to influence their local representatives and parties to support the legislation, tying them to the same electoral fate, prompt legislators to speak in favor of their local interests. This implies that sector-based policy concerns, when addressed by organized policy backers, are used as an effective mechanism for maintaining party unity and accountability in the legislature.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 450
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   THE UNIQUE CASE OF AFRICAN DEMOCRACY [J].
AKE, C .
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 1993, 69 (02) :239-244
[2]   Legislators' local roots: Disentangling the effect of district magnitude [J].
Andre, Audrey ;
Depauw, Sam ;
Deschouwer, Kris .
PARTY POLITICS, 2014, 20 (06) :904-917
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, AFRICA CONFIDENTIAL, V56
[4]   Legislatures on the rise? [J].
Barkan, Joel D. .
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2008, 19 (02) :124-137
[5]   Revisiting African Agriculture: Institutional Change and Productivity Growth [J].
Bates, Robert H. ;
Block, Steven A. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2013, 75 (02) :372-384
[6]   Civil society and political institutionalization [J].
Berman, S .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 1997, 40 (05) :562-574
[7]   Private Members' Bills in the UK Parliament: Is There an 'Electoral Connection'? [J].
Bowler, Shaun .
JOURNAL OF LEGISLATIVE STUDIES, 2010, 16 (04) :476-494
[8]   Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting [J].
Carey, John M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 51 (01) :92-107
[9]   Pressuring MPs to act: parliament, organized interests and policymaking in Uganda and Tanzania [J].
Collord, Michaela .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2021, 28 (04) :723-741
[10]  
Cox Gary., 2009, Political Representation, P342