Advanced tree-based machine learning methods for predicting the seismic response of regular and irregular RC frames

被引:8
作者
Demir, Ahmet [1 ,2 ]
Sahin, Emrehan Kutlug [1 ]
Demir, Selcuk [1 ]
机构
[1] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Bolu, Turkiye
[2] Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, TR-14030 Bolu, Turkiye
关键词
RC Frames; XGBoost; Machine Learning; Maximum Drift Ratio; Random Forest; DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS; INTENSITY MEASURES; RECORD SELECTION; MOTION RECORDS; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106524
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, predicting the maximum drift ratio (MDR) for two types of structures: 8-story regular (R8) and vertically irregular (IR8) reinforced concrete (RC) frames are focused. To accomplish this, advanced tree-based machine learning (ML) methods, namely Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Stochastic Gradient Boosting (SGB) are utilized. 2300 ground motion (GM) records, includes twenty-one input parameters and their nonlinear time history analyses results are considered as a dataset. The performance of the RF, XGBoost, and SGB models was examined considering the impact of the data pre-processing issue to test whether the use of data pre-processing approaches in model development could improve the prediction performance of the advanced ML models. Various data pre-processing techniques, including outlier detection using boxplot, missing data imputation using RF, data transformation using log transformation, and feature selection using Hill Climbing are employed as part of ML pipeline. The models' performance is evaluated using six different well-established statistical evaluation metrics. Subsequently, the results are systematically compared to identify the most effective prediction model. Our findings highlight the substantial impact of data pre-processing on the performance of ML models when predicting seismic responses, specifically the MDR of RC frames. Notably, RF consistently outperformed other ML models for both R8 and IR8 structures in the case of the simple ML pipeline strategy and data pre-processing approach. The RF model achieved R2 scores of R2 = 0.87 and R2 = 0.91 on the test data before implementing data pre-processing for R8 and IR8, respectively. After data preprocessing, R2 scores showed an improvement of 12% and 6.22% in the cases of R8 and IR8. In contrast, the performance scores of SGB consistently fell behind those of RF and XGBoost models.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Application of machine learning in seismic fragility assessment of bridges with SMA-restrained rocking columns
    Akbarnezhad, Miles
    Salehi, Mohammad
    DesRoches, Reginald
    [J]. STRUCTURES, 2023, 50 : 1320 - 1337
  • [2] Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems
    Akkar, S
    Özen, Ö
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2005, 34 (13) : 1551 - 1571
  • [3] Prediction of Strength and CBR Characteristics of Chemically Stabilized Coal Gangue: ANN and Random Forest Tree Approach
    Amin, Muhammad Nasir
    Iqbal, Mudassir
    Ashfaq, Mohammed
    Salami, Babatunde Abiodun
    Khan, Kaffayatullah
    Faraz, Muhammad Iftikhar
    Alabdullah, Anas Abdulalim
    Jalal, Fazal E.
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (12)
  • [4] NGA-West2 Database
    Ancheta, Timothy D.
    Darragh, Robert B.
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    Seyhan, Emel
    Silva, Walter J.
    Chiou, Brian S. -J.
    Wooddell, Katie E.
    Graves, Robert W.
    Kottke, Albert R.
    Boore, David M.
    Kishida, Tadahiro
    Donahue, Jennifer L.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2014, 30 (03) : 989 - 1005
  • [5] UNCERTAINTIES IN ESTABLISHING DESIGN EARTHQUAKES
    ANDERSON, JC
    BERTERO, VV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1987, 113 (08): : 1709 - 1724
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, Fema-440
  • [7] Code-based record selection methods for seismic performance assessment of buildings
    Araujo, Miguel
    Macedo, Luis
    Marques, Mario
    Castro, Jose Miguel
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2016, 45 (01) : 129 - 148
  • [8] Arias A., 1970, MEASURE EARTHQUAKE I, P438
  • [9] Babayomi M, 2023, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2301.02317, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.02317, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2301.02317]
  • [10] Benjamin J.R.A.A., 1988, EPRI Report NP-5930