Optimal Uniform Strength Design of Frame and Lattice Structures

被引:6
作者
Iandiorio, Christian [1 ]
Milani, Daniele [1 ]
Salvini, Pietro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Enterprise Engn, Via Politecn 1, I-00133 Rome, Italy
关键词
Shape Optimization; Uniform; -strength; Optimal Design; Frame Structures; Lattice Structures; Structural Optimization; CHARGED SYSTEM SEARCH; TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; TRUSS STRUCTURES; MINIMIZATION; GEOMETRY; COLUMN; FORM;
D O I
10.1016/j.compstruc.2024.107430
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper provides a procedure to obtain the uniform strength of frame and lattice structures. Uniform strength condition is achieved by performing the shape optimization of all beam elements of the structure. The beam shape which guarantees uniform strength is analytically deduced from the one-dimensional Timoshenko model. The optimization problem presents itself as the search for the zeros of the objective-functions vector, which is a non-linear system of equations representing the kinematic-congruence and forces balance at every node of the structure. The analytical formulation of the optimization problem allows to construct the objective-functions vector without the use of external structural computation, i.e. not recurring to any Finite Element Analysis to accomplish iterations. This latter feature entails a great advantage in terms of computing time required to perform optimization. The proposed analytical formulation allows to directly insert the uniform strength condition into the objective-functions vector, transforming the optimization into an unconstrained problem. Some examples are shown in which the performance of the optimization procedure is discussed in terms of robustness and rate of computational complexity while increasing the degrees of freedom of the structure. The reliability and the quality of the optimization are verified through Finite Element Analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Direct Transcription Approach to Dynamic Optimization Problems in Engineering [J].
Abdalla, Hassan Mohamed Abdelalim ;
Casagrande, Daniele .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED AND COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2022, 8 (02) :605-616
[2]   Optimal area variation for maximum stiffness isostatic beams under parametric linear distributed loads [J].
Abdalla, Hassan Mohamed Abdelalim ;
Casagrande, Daniele .
MECHANICS RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 111
[3]  
ABRAMOWITZ M, 1972, HDB MATH FUNCTIONS F
[4]   Topology and Sizing Optimization for Frame Structures with a Two-Level Approximation Method [J].
An, Haichao ;
Huang, Hai .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2017, 55 (03) :1044-1057
[5]   An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology [J].
Armstrong, Mark ;
Mehrabi, Hamid ;
Naveed, Nida .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2022, 84 :1001-1029
[6]   Review of formulations for structural and mechanical system optimization [J].
Arora, JS ;
Wang, Q .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 30 (04) :251-272
[7]   Topology optimization of lightweight periodic lattices under simultaneous compressive and shear stiffness constraints [J].
Asadpoure, Alireza ;
Valdevit, Lorenzo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2015, 60-61 :1-16
[8]   Ant colony optimization of irregular steel frames including elemental warping effect [J].
Aydogdu, I. ;
Saka, M. P. .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2012, 44 (01) :150-169
[9]  
Azegami H, 1991, J Soc Mech Eng Part C, V34, DOI [10.1299/kikaic.56.589, DOI 10.1299/KIKAIC.56.589]
[10]  
Azegami H, 1988, J Soc Mech Eng Part C, V54, DOI [10.1299/kikaia.54.2167, DOI 10.1299/KIKAIA.54.2167]