Screw Stimulation Thresholds for Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF): A Correlational Study

被引:0
作者
Abbasi, Hamid [1 ]
Moore, Dominic J. [1 ]
Rajaeirad, Mohadese [2 ]
Zhan, Jiawen [3 ]
机构
[1] Inspired Spine Hlth, Spine Surg, Burnsville, MN 55337 USA
[2] Univ Isfahan, Biomech, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Inspired Spine Hlth, Machine Learning, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
minimally invasive surgical procedures; minimally-invasive spine; lumbar-fusion; intra-operative neuromonitoring; spine surgury; SPINE SURGERY; EMG;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.62859
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study presents findings from an investigation into the correlation of neuromonitoring techniques in minimally invasive lumbar fusions and their open counterparts regarding acceptable thresholds for screw stimulation. The threshold for acceptable stimulation value for open surgery has been established. The study compared acceptable thresholds for open pedicle screws where there is more connection between the screw and the soft tissue. Methods: The neuromonitoring data of 17 patients who underwent oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLLIF) procedures between September 2023 to May 2024 were reviewed. Neuromonitoring was conducted throughout surgeries, recording stimulation thresholds for pedicle screws insulated and uninsulated, to simulate the environment of a screw during open and minimally invasive surgery respectively. Patients' BMI was also collected for potential correlation analysis. Results: Results indicate a discernible correlation between stimulation thresholds in open and minimally invasive surgeries, but no definitive correlation with BMI due to sample size limitations. Though a significant correlation between the two stimulating styles is apparent, there is a good correlation to suggest what threshold should determine a standard stimulation threshold for minimally invasive surgeries. Conclusion: The study emphasizes the need for refined neuromonitoring strategies in minimally invasive spinal fusion (MISF) surgeries to ensure patient safety and surgical effectiveness. Further research with larger cohorts is recommended to establish optimized protocols that have a clearly defined amplitude for MISF thresholds.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative study of clinical effects between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine
    Wang, YiXiao
    Song, Yang
    Ma, Yue
    Sun, Xinyu
    Wang, Hua
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 40 (10) : 2238 - 2242
  • [22] Diminishing Clinical Returns of Multilevel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Passias, Peter G.
    Bortz, Cole
    Horn, Samantha R.
    Segreto, Frank A.
    Stekas, Nicholas
    Ge, David H.
    Alas, Haddy
    Varlotta, Christopher G.
    Frangella, Nicholas J.
    Lafage, Renaud
    Lafage, Virginie
    Steinmetz, Leah
    Vasquez-Montes, Dennis
    Diebo, Bassel
    Janjua, Muhammad B.
    Moawad, Mohamed A.
    Deflorimonte, Chloe
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles S.
    Buckland, Aaron J.
    Gerling, Michael C.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (20) : E1181 - E1187
  • [23] Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Silva, Pedro S.
    Pereira, Paulo
    Monteiro, Pedro
    Silva, Pedro A.
    Vaz, Rui
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)
  • [24] Effects of Preoperative Simulation on Minimally Invasive Hybrid Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Rieger, Bernhard
    Jiang, Hongzhen
    Reinshagen, Clemens
    Molcanyi, Marek
    Zivcak, Jozef
    Gronemeyer, Dietrich
    Bosche, Bert
    Schackert, Gabriele
    Ruess, Daniel
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 106 : 578 - 588
  • [25] Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
    Burak M. Ozgur
    Kevin Yoo
    Gerardo Rodriguez
    William R. Taylor
    European Spine Journal, 2005, 14 : 887 - 894
  • [26] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes
    Karikari, Isaac O.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S294 - S301
  • [27] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Vazan, Martin
    Gempt, Jens
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Buchmann, Niels
    Ryang, Yu-Mi
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2017, 159 (06) : 1137 - 1146
  • [28] Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
    Ozgur, BM
    Yoo, K
    Rodriguez, G
    Taylor, WR
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (09) : 887 - 894
  • [29] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Martin Vazan
    Jens Gempt
    Bernhard Meyer
    Niels Buchmann
    Yu- Mi Ryang
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2017, 159 : 1137 - 1146
  • [30] Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive midline lumbar interbody fusion versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Djurasovic, Mladen
    Gum, Jeffrey L.
    Crawford, Charles H., III
    Owens, Kirk, II
    Brown, Morgan
    Steele, Portia
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 32 (01) : 31 - 35