Enhanced Bone Healing in Critical-Sized Rabbit Femoral Defects: Impact of Helical and Alternate Scaffold Architectures

被引:5
作者
Alonso-Fernandez, Ivan [1 ]
Haugen, Havard Jostein [2 ]
Nogueira, Liebert Parreiras [2 ]
Lopez-Alvarez, Miriam [3 ,4 ]
Gonzalez, Pio [3 ,4 ]
Lopez-Pena, Monica [1 ]
Gonzalez-Cantalapiedra, Antonio [1 ]
Munoz-Guzon, Fernando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago De Compostela, Vet Fac, Anat Anim Prod & Vet Clin Sci Dept, Campus Univ S-N, Lugo 27002, Spain
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Dent, Fac Dent, Dept Biomat, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Vigo, Ctr Invest Tecnol Energia & Proc Ind CINTECX, Grp Novos Mat, Vigo 36310, Spain
[4] Galicia Hlth Res Inst IIS Galicia Sur, SERGAS UVIGO, Vigo 36213, Spain
关键词
polylactic acid; bioceramic; 3D-printing technology; composite scaffolds; scaffold architecture; bone regeneration; ANIMAL-MODELS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; TISSUE; POROSITY; DESIGN; TEETH;
D O I
10.3390/polym16091243
中图分类号
O63 [高分子化学(高聚物)];
学科分类号
070305 ; 080501 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study investigates the effect of scaffold architecture on bone regeneration, focusing on 3D-printed polylactic acid-bioceramic calcium phosphate (PLA-bioCaP) composite scaffolds in rabbit femoral condyle critical defects. We explored two distinct scaffold designs to assess their influence on bone healing and scaffold performance. Structures with alternate (0 degrees/90 degrees) and helical (0 degrees/45 degrees/90 degrees/135 degrees/180 degrees) laydown patterns were manufactured with a 3D printer using a fused deposition modeling technique. The scaffolds were meticulously characterized for pore size, strut thickness, porosity, pore accessibility, and mechanical properties. The in vivo efficacy of these scaffolds was evaluated using a femoral condyle critical defect model in eight skeletally mature New Zealand White rabbits. Then, the results were analyzed micro-tomographically, histologically, and histomorphometrically. Our findings indicate that both scaffold architectures are biocompatible and support bone formation. The helical scaffolds, characterized by larger pore sizes and higher porosity, demonstrated significantly greater bone regeneration than the alternate structures. However, their lower mechanical strength presented limitations for use in load-bearing sites.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration [J].
Abbasi, Naghmeh ;
Hamlet, Stephen ;
Love, Robert M. ;
Nguyen, Nam-Trung .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE-ADVANCED MATERIALS AND DEVICES, 2020, 5 (01) :1-9
[2]   Structural characterization of bioceramics and mineralized tissues based on Raman and XRD techniques [J].
Aguiar, H. ;
Chiussi, S. ;
Lopez-Alvarez, M. ;
Gonzalez, P. ;
Serra, J. .
CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 44 (01) :495-504
[3]   In vitro comparison of 3D printed polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite and polylactic acid/bioglass composite scaffolds: Insights into materials for bone regeneration [J].
Alksne, Milda ;
Kalvaityte, Migle ;
Simoliunas, Egidijus ;
Rinkunaite, Ieva ;
Gendviliene, Ieva ;
Locs, Janis ;
Rutkunas, Vygandas ;
Bukelskiene, Virginija .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2020, 104
[4]   Preclinical Models for Skeletal Research: How Commonly Used Species Mimic (or Don't) Aspects of Human Bone [J].
Allen, Matthew R. .
TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 2017, 45 (07) :851-854
[5]   Use of 3D-printed polylactic acid/bioceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering in preclinical in vivo studies: A systematic review [J].
Alonso-Fernandez, Ivan ;
Haugen, Havard Jostein ;
Lopez-Pena, Monica ;
Gonzalez-Cantalapiedra, Antonio ;
Munoz, Fernando .
ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2023, 168 :1-21
[6]  
Amini Ami R., 2012, Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, V40, P363
[7]   Effects of scaffold architecture on cranial bone healing [J].
Berner, A. ;
Woodruff, M. A. ;
Lam, C. X. F. ;
Arafat, M. T. ;
Saifzadeh, S. ;
Steck, R. ;
Ren, J. ;
Nerlich, M. ;
Ekaputra, A. K. ;
Gibson, I. ;
Hutmacher, D. W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 43 (04) :506-513
[8]   3D-printed scaffold combined to 2D osteoinductive coatings to repair a critical-size mandibular bone defect [J].
Bouyer, M. ;
Garot, C. ;
Machillot, P. ;
Vollaire, J. ;
Fitzpatrick, V ;
Morand, S. ;
Boutonnat, J. ;
Josserand, V ;
Bettega, G. ;
Picart, C. .
MATERIALS TODAY BIO, 2021, 11
[9]   The Impact of Bioceramic Scaffolds on Bone Regeneration in Preclinical In Vivo Studies: A Systematic Review [J].
Brunello, Giulia ;
Panda, Sourav ;
Schiavon, Lucia ;
Sivolella, Stefano ;
Biasetto, Lisa ;
Del Fabbro, Massimo .
MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (07)
[10]  
Cheng A, 2019, TISSUE ENG PART B-RE, V25, P14, DOI [10.1089/ten.teb.2018.0119, 10.1089/ten.TEB.2018.0119]