The combination of climate information services in the decision-making process of farmers to reduce climate risks: Application of social cognition theory

被引:7
作者
Savari, Moslem [1 ]
Zhoolideh, Milad [2 ]
Limuie, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Khuzestan, Agr Sci & Nat Resources, Dept Agr Extens & Educ, Mollasani, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Fac Agr Econ & Dev, Dept Agr Management & Dev, Karaj, Iran
关键词
Climate information services; Risk management; Climate change; Farmer 's decision; Iran; RENEWABLE ENERGY-SOURCES; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; SELF-EFFICACY; IMPACT; AGRICULTURE; ADAPTATION; BEHAVIOR; WEATHER; WILLINGNESS; FORECASTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100500
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the main instruments of risk management and climate risk reduction in the agricultural sector is the use of climate information services (CIS). Meteorological information can be useful for society by increasing the efficiency of resource consumption and helping to improve decision-making management. However, there is a gap between the production and implementation of weather forecasts, and that is the lack of practical use of weather forecasts in the agricultural decision-making process. In doing so, this research was conducted with the main objective of identifying components influencing the utilize of CIS by farmers in southwest Iran. The research utilized social cognitive theory (SCT) as the underlying framework, employing a survey method and employing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for analysis. The research encompassed all farmers residing in Dezful city within the Khuzestan province, located in the southwest of Iran. The results showed that the variables of SCT, namely outcome expectations, perception of others' behavior, self-efficacy, socio-structural, and behavioral intentions are very powerful in identifying factors affecting farmers' use of CIS and can account for 76.4% of the variance of farmers' behavior. Therefore, these research results can provide essential help to authorities to mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on agriculture.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Opportunities and barriers for using climate information for building resilient agricultural systems in Sudan savannah agro-ecological zone of north-eastern Ghana
    Antwi-Agyei, Philip
    Dougill, Andrew J.
    Abaidoo, Robert C.
    [J]. CLIMATE SERVICES, 2021, 22
  • [2] Arora N. K., 2019, Environ. Sustainability, V2, P95, DOI DOI 10.1007/S42398-019-00078-W
  • [3] Understanding the influence of climate forecasts on farmer decisions as planned behavior
    Artikov, Ikrom
    Hoffman, Stacey J.
    Lynne, Gary D.
    Zillig, Lisa M. Pytlik
    Hu, Qi
    Tomkins, Alan J.
    Hubbard, Kenneth G.
    Hayes, Michael J.
    Waltman, William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2006, 45 (09) : 1202 - 1214
  • [4] Health promotion by social cognitive means
    Bandura, A
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2004, 31 (02) : 143 - 164
  • [5] Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
  • [6] Farmers' perception of climate change, impact and adaptation strategies: a case study of four villages in the semi-arid regions of India
    Banerjee, Rupsha R.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 75 (03) : 2829 - 2845
  • [7] Engagement, involvement and empowerment: Three realms of a coproduction framework for climate services
    Bojovic, Dragana
    St Clair, Asuncion Lera
    Christel, Isadora
    Terrado, Marta
    Stanzel, Philipp
    Gonzalez, Paula
    Palin, Erika J.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2021, 68
  • [8] A global meta-analysis of climate services and decision-making in agriculture
    Born, Lorna
    Prager, Steven
    Ramirez-Villegas, Julian
    Imbach, Pablo
    [J]. CLIMATE SERVICES, 2021, 22
  • [9] Climate services: Lessons learned and future prospects
    Brasseur, Guy P.
    Gallardo, Laura
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2016, 4 (03) : 79 - 89
  • [10] Reconceptuali sing the 'behavioural approach' in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective
    Burton, RJF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2004, 20 (03) : 359 - 371