Long-term follow-up results of multiparametric prostate MRI and the prognostic value of PI-RADS: a single-center retrospective cohort study

被引:1
|
作者
Onder, Omer [1 ]
Ayva, Mujdat [2 ]
Yarasir, Yasin [1 ]
Gurler, Volkan [1 ]
Yazici, Mustafa Sertac [2 ]
Akdogan, Bulent [2 ]
Karaosmanoglu, Ali Devrim [1 ]
Karcaaltincaba, Musturay [1 ]
Ozmen, Mustafa Nasuh [1 ]
Akata, Deniz [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkiye
来源
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY | 2024年 / 30卷 / 03期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Prostatic neoplasm; follow-up studies; multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; prognosis; PSA DENSITY; ANTIGEN; CANCER; MEN; BIOPSY; PI-RADS(TM); ACCURACY;
D O I
10.4274/dir.2023.232414
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE We aim to examine the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) for suspected prostate cancer (PCa), specifically based on their initial Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI -RADS) categories and various clinical factors. Our secondary aim is to evaluate the prognostic value of the PI -RADS through the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group distribution. METHODS This research was conducted as a single -center retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 1,359 cases having at least one histopathological examination after the initial mp-MRI and/or adequate clinical/radiological follow-up data were included in the clinically significant PCa (cs-PCa) diagnosis -free survival analysis. Initial mp-MRI dates were accepted as the start of follow-up for the time -to -event analysis. The event was defined as cs-PCa diagnosis (International Society of Urological Pathology >= 2). Patients who were not diagnosed with cs-PCa during follow-up were censored according to predefined literature -based criteria at the end of the maximum follow-up duration with no reasonable suspicion of PCa and no biopsy indication. The impact of various factors on survival was assessed using a log -rank test and multivariable Cox regression. Subsequently, 394 cases diagnosed with PCa during follow-up were evaluated, based on initial PI -RADS categories and NCCN risk groups. RESULTS Three main risk factors for cs-PCa diagnosis during follow-up were an initial PI -RADS 5 category, initial PI -RADS 4 category, and high MRI-defined PSA density (mPSAD), with average hazard ratios of 29.52, 14.46, and 3.12, respectively. The PI -RADS 3 category, advanced age group, and biopsy -na & iuml;ve status were identified as additional risk factors (hazard ratios: 2.03, 1.54-1.98, and 1.79, respectively). In the PI -RADS 1-2 cohort, 1, 3, and 5 -year cs-PCa diagnosis -free survival rates were 99.1%, 96.5%, and 93.8%, respectively. For the PI -RADS 3 cohort, 1, 3, and 5 -year cs-PCa diagnosis -free survival rates were 94.9%, 90.9%, and 89.1%, respectively. For the PI -RADS 4 cohort, 1, 3, and 5 -year cs-PCa diagnosis -free survival rates were 56.6%, 55.1%, and 55.1%, respectively. These rates were found to all be 24.2% in the PI -RADS 5 cohort. Considering the 394 cases diagnosed with PCa during follow-up, PI -RADS >= 4 cases were more likely to harbor unfavorable PCa compared to PI -RADS <= 3 cases ( P < 0.001). In the PI -RADS 3 subgroup analysis, a low mPSAD (<0.15 ng/mL 2 ) was found to be a protective prognostic factor against unfavorable PCa ( P = 0.005). CONCLUSION The PI -RADS category has a significant impact on patient management and provides important diagnostic and prognostic information. Higher initial PI -RADS categories are associated with decreased follow-up losses, a shorter time to PCa diagnosis, increased biopsy rates, a higher likelihood of developing cs-PCa during follow-up, and a worse PCa prognosis. Combining mPSAD with PIRADS categories could enhance diagnostic stratification in the identification of cs-PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 151
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single center analysis of an advisable control interval for follow-up of patients with PI-RADS category 3 in multiparametric MRI of the prostate
    Boschheidgen, M.
    Schimmoller, L.
    Doerfler, S.
    Al-Monajjed, R.
    Morawitz, J.
    Ziayee, F.
    Mally, D.
    Quentin, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Ullrich, T.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [2] Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with PI-RADS Category 3 Lesions: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study
    Tunc, Burgin
    Gencturk, Mert
    Akturk, Adem
    Kantarci, Fatih
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (05) : 329 - 336
  • [3] Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and 2 in a Cohort of 245 Patients with Histopathological Reference and Long-Term Follow-Up
    De Visschere, Pieter
    Pattyn, Eva
    Ost, Piet
    Claeys, Tom
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Villeirs, Geert
    JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 100 (01):
  • [4] Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and PI-RADS version 2.0 for differentiating histologically benign prostate disease from prostate cancer in biopsies: A retrospective single-center comparison
    Tosun, Mesude
    Uslu, Hande
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 78 (78) : 98 - 103
  • [5] Long-term follow-up of congenital hydronephrosis in a single-center study
    Morizawa, Yosuke
    Aoki, Katsuya
    Fukui, Shinji
    Tomizawa, Mitsuru
    Shimizu, Takuto
    Onishi, Kenta
    Hori, Shunta
    Gotoh, Daisuke
    Nakai, Yasushi
    Miyake, Makito
    Torimoto, Kazumasa
    Fujimoto, Ken
    Otani, Takeshi
    Fujimoto, Kiyohide
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (05) : 507 - 511
  • [6] EVALUATION OF PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (PI-RADS) VERSION 2 FOR PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
    Grbanovic, Lora
    Kovacevic, Lucija
    Kulis, Tomislav
    Kastelan, Zeljko
    Kralik, Marko
    Ivandic, Stjepan
    Prutki, Maja
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2024, 63 : 14 - 21
  • [7] Predictive value of prostate calcification for future cancer occurrence: a retrospective long-term follow-up cohort study
    Kumasaka, Soma
    Seki, Yuko
    Takayama, Hiroaki
    Kumasaka, Yuka
    Dineen, Rob A.
    Tsushima, Yoshito
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 96 (1147)
  • [8] The prognostic value of electroencephalography in epilepsy: a long-term follow-up study
    Gatzonis, Stylianos
    Triantafyllou, Nikolaos
    Kateri, Maria
    Siatouni, Anna
    Angelopoulos, Elias
    Kimiskidis, Vasilios K.
    NEUROLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 2 (02) : 73 - 76
  • [9] A single-center long-term experience of active surveillance for prostate cancer: 15 years of follow-up
    Song, Sang Hun
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Lee, Hakmin
    Lee, Sangchul
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok Soo
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2021, 62 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [10] Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Male Breast Cancer, Single-Center Experience
    Cakar, Burcu
    Sert, Fatma
    Gursoy, Pinar
    Emekdas, Baris
    Ozsaran, Zeynep
    Gokmen, Erhan
    Haydaroglu, Ayfer
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 34 (02): : 66 - 71