Optimize Electron Beam Energy toward In Situ Imaging of Thick Frozen Bio-Samples with Nanometer Resolution Using MeV-STEM

被引:2
作者
Yang, Xi [1 ]
Wang, Liguo [2 ]
Smaluk, Victor [1 ]
Shaftan, Timur [1 ]
机构
[1] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Natl Synchrotron Light Source 2, Upton, NY 11973 USA
[2] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Lab Biomol Struct, Upton, NY 11973 USA
关键词
electron bio-sample interaction; MeV-STEM; Monte Carlo simulation; beam broadening; Optics of STEM column; MICROSCOPY;
D O I
10.3390/nano14090803
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
To optimize electron energy for in situ imaging of large biological samples up to 10 mu m in thickness with nanoscale resolutions, we implemented an analytical model based on elastic and inelastic characteristic angles. This model has been benchmarked by Monte Carlo simulations and can be used to predict the transverse beam size broadening as a function of electron energy while the probe beam traverses through the sample. As a result, the optimal choice of the electron beam energy can be realized. In addition, the impact of the dose-limited resolution was analysed. While the sample thickness is less than 10 mu m, there exists an optimal electron beam energy below 10 MeV regarding a specific sample thickness. However, for samples thicker than 10 mu m, the optimal beam energy is 10 MeV or higher depending on the sample thickness, and the ultimate resolution could become worse with the increase in the sample thickness. Moreover, a MeV-STEM column based on a two-stage lens system can be applied to reduce the beam size from one micron at aperture to one nanometre at the sample with the energy tuning range from 3 to 10 MeV. In conjunction with the state-of-the-art ultralow emittance electron source that we recently implemented, the maximum size of an electron beam when it traverses through an up to 10 mu m thick bio-sample can be kept less than 10 nm. This is a critical step toward the in situ imaging of large, thick biological samples with nanometer resolution.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
BALDWIN WW, 1995, ARCH MICROBIOL, V164, P155
[2]   Towards high-throughput in situ structural biology using electron cryotomography [J].
Bohning, Jan ;
Bharat, Tanmay A. M. .
PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2021, 160 :97-103
[3]   Relative merits and limiting factors for x-ray and electron microscopy of thick, hydrated organic materials [J].
Du, Ming ;
Jacobsen, Chris .
ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2018, 184 :293-309
[4]  
Durchschlag, 1986, THERMODYNAMIC DATA B, P45
[5]   Choice of operating voltage for a transmission electron microscope [J].
Egerton, R. F. .
ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2014, 145 :85-93
[6]   Monte Carlo simulation of the energy loss of low-energy electrons in liquid water [J].
Emfietzoglou, D ;
Karava, K ;
Papamichael, G ;
Moscovitch, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (15) :2355-2371
[7]   Monte-Carlo techniques for radiotherapy applications I: introduction and overview of the different Monte-Carlo codes [J].
Fielding, Andrew L. .
JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2023, 22
[8]   Accessing radiation damage to biomolecules on the nanoscale by particle-scattering simulations [J].
Hahn, Marc Benjamin .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 7 (04)
[9]   THE POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF NEUTRONS, ELECTRONS AND X-RAYS FOR ATOMIC-RESOLUTION MICROSCOPY OF UNSTAINED BIOLOGICAL MOLECULES [J].
HENDERSON, R .
QUARTERLY REVIEWS OF BIOPHYSICS, 1995, 28 (02) :171-193
[10]  
Howard J, 2001, Mechanics of motor proteins and the cytoskeleton