Structural reliability analysis under stochastic seismic excitations and multidimensional limit state based on gamma mixture model and copula function

被引:1
作者
Jia, Da-Wei [1 ]
Wu, Zi-Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Mech Civil Engn & Architecture, Xian 710129, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Reliability analysis; Stochastic seismic excitations; Multidimensional limit state; Gamma mixture model; Copula function; FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT; DYNAMIC-SYSTEMS; PROBABILITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103621
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A novel method for analyzing the reliability of structures under non-stationary stochastic seismic excitations, considering the combined effect of multiple structural demand extreme values, is proposed. The spectral representation method is employed to establish a non-stationary stochastic seismic excitation model, and based on the theory of first-passage probability, multiple integral formulas for seismic reliability under multidimensional limit states are derived. The extreme value distribution is established using the Gamma mixture model (GMM). The equations for estimating the model parameters are derived based on both fractional moments and momentgenerating functions, while the determination of the number of gamma distribution components is guided by the probability distribution and statistical characteristics of the samples. The joint probability density function (JPDF) for multiple demand extreme values is established by incorporating copula functions to account for correlation, and the fitting accuracy of different copula functions is assessed. The proposed method is illustrated using reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures. The results demonstrate that the fitting accuracy of extreme value distribution can be enhanced by adjusting the number of gamma distribution components in the GMM, which exhibits high accuracy in fitting both the main and tail regions. The presence of correlation can induce variations in the JPDF, thereby exerting an influence on the failure probability. Consequently, disregarding correlation is not conducive to reliability analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Assessment of seismic collapse probability of RC shaft supported tank [J].
Amin, Jignesh ;
Gondaliya, Kaushik ;
Mulchandani, Chirag .
STRUCTURES, 2021, 33 :2639-2658
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GB50011-2010
[3]   Assessment of various seismic fragility analysis approaches for structures excited by non-stationary stochastic ground motions [J].
Cao, Xu-Yang ;
Feng, De-Cheng ;
Li, Yue .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2023, 186
[4]   Seismic reliability evaluation of bridges under spatially varying ground motions using a four-parameter distribution [J].
Chen, Zhi-Qiang ;
Zheng, Shi-Xiong ;
Ding, Zi-Hao ;
Zhang, Jin ;
Tai, Yu-Ji .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 247
[5]   Seismic reliability analysis of high-pier railway bridges with correlated random parameters via an improved maximum entropy method [J].
Chen, Zhi-Qiang ;
Zheng, Shi-Xiong ;
Zhang, Jin ;
Jia, Hongyu .
STRUCTURES, 2021, 33 :4538-4555
[6]   Efficient seismic reliability analysis of non-linear structures under non-stationary ground motions [J].
Chen, Zhi-Qiang ;
Zheng, Shi-Xiong ;
Zhang, Jin ;
Dang, Chao ;
Wei, Kai ;
Li, Xi .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 139
[7]   Multidimensional Performance Limit State for Hazard Fragility Functions [J].
Cimellaro, G. P. ;
Reinhorn, A. M. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2011, 137 (01) :47-60
[8]   An approach to evaluation of EVD and small failure probabilities of uncertain nonlinear structures under stochastic seismic excitations [J].
Dang, Chao ;
Wei, Pengfei ;
Beer, Michael .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 152
[9]   A mixture distribution with fractional moments for efficient seismic reliability analysis of nonlinear structures [J].
Dang, Chao ;
Xu, Jun .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 208
[10]   Multi-dimensional damage measure for seismic reliability analysis [J].
De Risi, Raffaele ;
Goda, Katsuichiro ;
Tesfamariam, Solomon .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2019, 78 :1-11