Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk

被引:5
作者
Arefan, Dooman [1 ]
Zuley, Margarita L. [1 ,2 ]
Berg, Wendie A. [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Lu [1 ,3 ]
Sumkin, Jules H. [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Shandong [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 3240 Craft Pl,Room 322, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Chongqing Univ, Canc Hosp, Chongqing Key Lab Translat Res Canc Metastasis & I, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biomed Informat, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Intelligent Syst Program, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
FIBROGLANDULAR TISSUE; GENE-EXPRESSION; CHEMOTHERAPY; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.230269
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of cancer-free breasts increases the risk of developing breast cancer; implications of quantitative BPE in ipsilateral breasts with breast cancer are largely unexplored. Purpose: To determine whether quantitative BPE measurements in one or both breasts could be used to predict recurrence risk in women with breast cancer, using the Oncotype DX recurrence score as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant retrospective single-institution study included women diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2007 and January 2012 (development set) and between January 2012 and January 2017 (internal test set). Quantitative BPE was automatically computed using an in-house-developed computer algorithm in both breasts. Univariable logistic regression was used to examine the association of BPE with Oncotype DX recurrence score binarized into high-risk (recurrence score >25) and low- or intermediate-risk (recurrence score <= 25) categories. Models including BPE measures were assessed for their ability to distinguish patients with high risk versus those with low or intermediate risk and the actual recurrence outcome. Results: The development set included 127 women (mean age, 58 years +/- 10.2 [SD]; 33 with high risk and 94 with low or intermediate risk) with an actual local or distant recurrence rate of 15.7% (20 of 127) at a minimum 10 years of follow-up. The test set included 60 women (mean age, 57.8 years +/- 11.6; 16 with high risk and 44 with low or intermediate risk). BPE measurements quantified in both breasts were associated with increased odds of a high-risk Oncotype DX recurrence score (odds ratio range, 1.27-1.66 [95% CI: 1.02, 2.56]; P < .001 to P = .04). Measures of BPE combined with tumor radiomics helped distinguish patients with a high-risk Oncotype DX recurrence score from those with a low- or intermediate-risk score, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 in the development set and 0.79 in the test set. For the combined models, the negative predictive values were 0.97 and 0.93 in predicting actual distant recurrence and local recurrence, respectively. Conclusion: Ipsilateral and contralateral DCE MRI measures of BPE quantified in patients with breast cancer can help distinguish patients with high recurrence risk from those with low or intermediate recurrence risk, similar to Oncotype DX recurrence score.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Differentiating axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer patients: A comparison of radiomic signatures from multiparametric breast MR sequences
    Chai, Ruimei
    Ma, He
    Xu, Mingjie
    Arefan, Dooman
    Cui, Xiaoyu
    Liu, Yi
    Zhang, Lina
    Wu, Shandong
    Xu, Ke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (04) : 1125 - 1132
  • [2] Background parenchymal enhancement in the contralateral normal breast of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy measured by DCE-MRI
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Yu, Hon
    Lin, Muqing
    Mehta, Rita S.
    Su, Min-Ying
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 31 (09) : 1465 - 1478
  • [3] Tumor gene expression and prognosis in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes
    Cobleigh, MA
    Tabesh, B
    Bitterman, P
    Baker, J
    Cronin, M
    Liu, ML
    Borchik, R
    Mosquera, JM
    Walker, MG
    Shak, S
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (24) : 8623 - 8631
  • [4] Breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement as an imaging bridge to molecular cancer sub-type
    Dilorenzo, Giuseppe
    Telegrafo, Michele
    La Forgia, Daniele
    Ianora, Amato Antonio Stabile
    Moschetta, Marco
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 113 : 148 - 152
  • [5] Are Qualitative Assessments of Background Parenchymal Enhancement, Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue on MR Images, and Mammographic Density Associated with Breast Cancer Risk?
    Dontchos, Brian N.
    Rahbar, Habib
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    Korde, Larissa A.
    Lam, Diana L.
    Scheel, John R.
    Peacock, Sue
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 276 (02) : 371 - 380
  • [6] Esteban J, 2003, P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL
  • [7] MRI Radiomic Features: Association with Disease-Free Survival in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Kim, Sungwon
    Kim, Min Jung
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Yoon, Jung Hyun
    Park, Vivian Youngjean
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [8] Impact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI
    King, Valencia
    Gu, Yajia
    Kaplan, Jennifer B.
    Brooks, Jennifer D.
    Pike, Malcolm C.
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (12) : 2641 - 2647
  • [9] Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Breast MR Imaging and Breast Cancer Risk
    King, Valencia
    Brooks, Jennifer D.
    Bernstein, Jonine L.
    Reiner, Anne S.
    Pike, Malcolm C.
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 260 (01) : 50 - 60
  • [10] Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Postoperative Surveillance Breast MRI: Association with Future Second Breast Cancer Risk
    Lee, Su Hyun
    Jang, Myoung-jin
    Yoen, Heera
    Lee, Youkyoung
    Kim, Yeon Soo
    Park, Ah Reum
    Ha, Su Min
    Kim, Soo-Yeon
    Chang, Jung Min
    Cho, Nariya
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (01) : 90 - 99