Opportunity abandonment: Why are entrepreneurs vulnerable to type I and II errors?

被引:0
|
作者
Arshi, Tahseen Anwer [1 ]
Rao, Venkoba [2 ]
Butt, Atif Saleem [3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Ras Al Khaimah, Associate Provost Res & Community Serv, Bldg 75,Sheikh Humaid Bin Mohammed Area, Seih Al Araibi 72603, Ras al Khaimah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Majan Univ Coll, Muscat, Oman
[3] Atif Saleem Butt Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
关键词
Opportunity abandonment; Decision error; Reification fallacy; Construal mindsets; Stakeholders; CONSTRUAL-LEVEL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; DECISION-MAKING; BUSINESS MODELS; PERSPECTIVE; CAPACITY; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30094
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Opportunity actualization is a critical competency attributed to entrepreneurs, which has received widespread attention in the entrepreneurship literature. However, the knowledge of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Abandonment (EOA) decisions is limited. We, therefore, explore the relatively under-studied EOA, analyzing why entrepreneurs commit decision errors, abandon potentially viable opportunities (type I error) or pursue non-opportunity spaces (type II error), and ultimately forsake them later. Through a scoping literature review, we highlight more profound psychological variables that shape entrepreneurial opportunity behavior triggering EOA decisions. We discuss entrepreneurial cognitive limitations in articulating, concretizing, and communicating the opportunity. We argue that varying construal mindsets cause reification fallacies and create perceptual blocks in enunciating an opportunity idea. Further, subjective stakeholder feedback and biased information exchange largely shape EOA decisions, which are mediated through the information processing capacity of entrepreneurs. Finally, we propose four entrepreneurial decision-limiting hypotheses which require an empirical investigation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Decision quality by the loss cost of Type i and Type II errors
    Chen, Y.-C. (cycdavidchen@hotmail.com), 1600, JAI Press (25): : 202 - 220
  • [2] Compromising prioritization from pairwise comparisons considering type I and II errors
    Kim, Deok-Hwan
    Kim, Kwang-Jae
    Park, K. Sam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 204 (02) : 285 - 293
  • [3] "I can't get it out of my mind" - Why, how, and when crisis rumination leads entrepreneurs to act and pivot during crises
    Nguyen, Bach
    Tran, Hai-Anh
    Stephan, Ute
    Van, Ha Nguyen
    Anh, Pham Thi Hoang
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2024, 39 (04)
  • [4] Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study. Part I: why and for whom?
    Silva, Valter
    Grande, Antonio Jose
    Cabrera Martimbianco, Ana Luiza
    Riera, Rachel
    Viegas Carvalho, Alan Pedrosa
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 130 (06): : 398 - 404
  • [5] Why Did China's Zero-COVID Policy Persist? Decision Urgency, Regime Type, and Political Opportunity Structures
    Keng, Shu
    Zhong, Lingna
    Xie, Fang
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CHINA, 2024, 33 (146) : 206 - 222
  • [6] Transforming an arbitrary code for the wiretap channel of type I into a code for the wiretap channel of type II
    Graves, Eric
    Beemer, Allison
    2019 IEEE INFORMATION THEORY WORKSHOP (ITW), 2019, : 684 - 688
  • [7] RADIATION PRESSURE FORCE AND BLACK HOLE MASS DETERMINATION IN LOW-REDSHIFT TYPE-I AND TYPE-II ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI
    Netzer, Hagai
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 695 (01) : 793 - 797