The Dynamic Interplay Between Bottom-Up and Top-Down Processes Supporting Prospective Remembering

被引:42
作者
Shelton, Jill Talley [1 ]
Scullin, Michael K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Psychol, 615 McCallie Ave, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Waco, TX 76798 USA
关键词
prospective memory; spontaneous retrieval; involuntary memory; monitoring; metacognition; working memory; attention; aging; context; PROSPECTIVE MEMORY EVIDENCE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SPONTANEOUS RETRIEVAL; WORKING-MEMORY; CONTEXT; INTENTIONS; FRAMEWORK; CAPACITY; DEMANDS; COST;
D O I
10.1177/0963721417700504
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Like many dual process theories in the psychological sciences, existing models of prospective memory (i.e., remembering to execute future intentions) emphasize the role of singular top-down or bottom-up processes that act in isolation. We argue that top-down and bottom-up processes are interconnected and dynamically interact to support prospective memory. We elaborate on this dynamic multiprocess framework by focusing on recent behavioral, neuroimaging, and eye-tracking research that demonstrated the dynamic nature of monitoring (top-down) and spontaneous retrieval (bottom-up) processes in relation to contextual factors, metacognition, and individual differences. We conclude that identifying how dual processes interact with environmental and individual difference factors is crucial for advancing understanding of cognition and behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 358
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Response dynamics in prospective memory [J].
Abney, Drew H. ;
McBride, Dawn M. ;
Conte, Angela M. ;
Vinson, David W. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (04) :1020-1028
[2]   Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind [J].
Barrett, LF ;
Tugade, MM ;
Engle, RW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2004, 130 (04) :553-573
[3]   The Unbidden Past: Involuntary Autobiographical Memories as a Basic Mode of Remembering [J].
Berntsen, Dorthe .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 19 (03) :138-142
[4]  
Braver T.S., 2007, VARIATION WORKING ME, P76, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195168648.003.0004, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168648.003.0004]
[5]   On the role of episodic future simulation in encoding of prospective memories [J].
Brewer, Gene A. ;
Marsh, Richard L. .
COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 1 (02) :81-88
[6]   Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection [J].
Brewer, Gene A. ;
Knight, Justin B. ;
Marsh, Richard L. ;
Unsworth, Nash .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (03) :304-311
[7]  
Bugg J.M., 2013, The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, P267, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195376746.013.0018
[8]   The effect of implementation intention on prospective memory: A systematic and meta-analytic review [J].
Chen, Xing-jie ;
Wang, Ya ;
Liu, Lu-lu ;
Cui, Ji-fang ;
Gan, Ming-yuan ;
Shum, David H. K. ;
Chan, Raymond C. K. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2015, 226 (01) :14-22
[9]   Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task [J].
Cohen, Anna-Lisa ;
Gordon, Aliza ;
Jaudas, Alexander ;
Hefer, Carmen ;
Dreisbach, Gesine .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2017, 81 (02) :366-377
[10]   The Effects of Focal and Nonfocal Cues on the Neural Correlates of Prospective Memory: Insights From ERPs [J].
Cona, Giorgia ;
Bisiacchi, Patrizia S. ;
Moscovitch, Morris .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2014, 24 (10) :2630-2646