Fewer Dislocations After Total Hip Arthroplasty With Robotic Assistance or Fluoroscopic Guidance

被引:0
|
作者
Di Gangi, Catherine [1 ]
Prinos, Alana [1 ]
Buehring, Weston [1 ]
Meere, Patrick A. [1 ]
Meftah, Morteza [1 ]
Hepinstall, Matthew S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; navigation; robotics; technology-assisted arthroplasty; dislocations; NAVIGATION; SURGERY; TECHNOLOGY; ANTERIOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Computer navigation and robotic assistance may reduce total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocations by improving the accuracy and precision of component positioning. We investigated dislocation rates for THAs using conventional techniques, robotic assistance, and computer navigation, while controlling for surgical approach, dual mobility (DM) use, and fluoroscopic guidance. Methods: We reviewed 11,740 primary THAs performed between June 2016 and December 2022, including 5,873 conventional, 1,293 with robotic-arm assistance, and 4,574 with navigation. The approach was posterior in 6,580 (56.0%), anterior in 4,342 (37.0%), and lateral in 818 (7.0%). A DM was used in 10.4%. Fluoroscopy was used in 3,653 cases and only with the anterior approach. Multivariate analyses yielded odds ratios (OR) for dislocation and revision. Additional regression analyses for dislocation were performed for approach and DM. Results: Raw dislocation rates were as follows: conventional 1.2%, robotic 0.4%, navigation 0.9%, anterior with fluoroscopy 0.4%, anterior without fluoroscopy 2.3%, posterior 1.3%, and lateral 0.5%. Upon multivariate analysis, use of robotics was found to be associated with significantly reduced dislocation risk compared to conventional (OR: 0.3), as did anterior (OR: 0.6) compared to posterior approach; navigation and lateral approach were not found to be associated with a significant reduction in risk. For the anterior approach, multivariate analysis demonstrated that fluoroscopy significantly reduced dislocation risk (OR: 0.1), while DM, robotics, and navigation were not significant. For the posterior approach, the dislocation risk was lower with robotics than with conventional (OR: 0.2); the use of navigation or DM did not demonstrate a significant reduction in risk. Conclusions: The use of robotics was associated with a reduction in dislocations for this cohort overall. Further, fluoroscopy in the anterior approach and robotic assistance in the posterior approach were both associated with decreased dislocation risk. The role of imageless computer navigation and DM implants requires further study. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:S359 / S366
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fused hip conversion to total hip arthroplasty with the direct anterior approach: surgical technique on a regular surgical table under fluoroscopic guidance
    Iñaki Mimendia
    Víctor Barro
    Martin Sierra
    Andrés Aliaga-Martínez
    Ernesto Guerra-Farfán
    Alejandro Hernández
    International Orthopaedics, 2024, 48 : 1165 - 1170
  • [32] Improved short-term outcomes for a novel, fluoroscopy-based robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system compared to manual technique with fluoroscopic assistance
    Buchan, Graham B. J.
    Hecht II, Christian J.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    Chen, James B.
    Kamath, Atul F.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (01) : 501 - 508
  • [33] Fluoroscopy-based robotic assistance for total hip arthroplasty improves acetabular cup placement accuracy for obese patients compared to the manual, fluoroscopic-assisted technique
    Ong, Christian B.
    Buchan, Graham B. J.
    Hecht II, Christian J.
    Kendoff, Daniel O.
    Homma, Yasuhiro
    Kamath, Atul F.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2024, 32 (05) : 3703 - 3712
  • [34] Accuracy of acetabular cup positioning in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty: a CT-based evaluation
    Singh, Ashish
    Kumar, Purushotam
    Kalyan, Kanukuntla
    Gundalli, Akash Chandrashekar
    Mane, Sudhir Shankar
    Swarnkar, Himanshu
    Singh, Lavanya
    SICOT-J, 2024, 10
  • [35] Robotic-assistance is associated with better joint outcomes compared to conventional techniques in surgically routine total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched large database study of 3948 patients
    Shah, Aakash K.
    Lavu, Monish S.
    Burkhart, Robert J.
    Hecht II, Christian J.
    Blackburn, Collin
    Romeo, Nicholas
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2025, 145 (01)
  • [36] Sport after Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty
    Boettner, Friedrich
    Kasparek, Maximilian F.
    Rueckl, Kilian
    Liebau, Christian
    SPORTVERLETZUNG-SPORTSCHADEN, 2017, 31 (04) : 207 - 212
  • [37] MyHip: supporting planning and surgical guidance for a better total hip arthroplasty
    Schmid, Jerome
    Chenes, Christophe
    Chague, Sylvain
    Hoffmeyer, Pierre
    Christofilopoulos, Panayiotis
    Bernardoni, Massimiliano
    Charbonnier, Caecilia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2015, 10 (10) : 1547 - 1556
  • [38] Precision of acetabular cup placement in robotic integrated total hip arthroplasty
    Elson, Leah
    Dounchis, Jon
    Illgen, Richard
    Marchand, Robert C.
    Padgett, Douglas E.
    Bragdon, Charles R.
    Malchau, Henrik
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 25 (06) : 531 - 536
  • [39] Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty for Traumatic Acetabular Fracture Using an Image-free Second-Generation System
    Leal, Justin
    Kugelman, David N.
    Goel, Rahul K.
    Cochrane, Niall H.
    Seyler, Thorsten M.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2024, 30
  • [40] A review of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty
    Kwangkyoun Kim
    Seungcheol Kwon
    Junhyuk Kwon
    Jihyo Hwang
    Biomedical Engineering Letters, 2023, 13 : 523 - 535