Fewer Dislocations After Total Hip Arthroplasty With Robotic Assistance or Fluoroscopic Guidance

被引:0
|
作者
Di Gangi, Catherine [1 ]
Prinos, Alana [1 ]
Buehring, Weston [1 ]
Meere, Patrick A. [1 ]
Meftah, Morteza [1 ]
Hepinstall, Matthew S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; navigation; robotics; technology-assisted arthroplasty; dislocations; NAVIGATION; SURGERY; TECHNOLOGY; ANTERIOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Computer navigation and robotic assistance may reduce total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocations by improving the accuracy and precision of component positioning. We investigated dislocation rates for THAs using conventional techniques, robotic assistance, and computer navigation, while controlling for surgical approach, dual mobility (DM) use, and fluoroscopic guidance. Methods: We reviewed 11,740 primary THAs performed between June 2016 and December 2022, including 5,873 conventional, 1,293 with robotic-arm assistance, and 4,574 with navigation. The approach was posterior in 6,580 (56.0%), anterior in 4,342 (37.0%), and lateral in 818 (7.0%). A DM was used in 10.4%. Fluoroscopy was used in 3,653 cases and only with the anterior approach. Multivariate analyses yielded odds ratios (OR) for dislocation and revision. Additional regression analyses for dislocation were performed for approach and DM. Results: Raw dislocation rates were as follows: conventional 1.2%, robotic 0.4%, navigation 0.9%, anterior with fluoroscopy 0.4%, anterior without fluoroscopy 2.3%, posterior 1.3%, and lateral 0.5%. Upon multivariate analysis, use of robotics was found to be associated with significantly reduced dislocation risk compared to conventional (OR: 0.3), as did anterior (OR: 0.6) compared to posterior approach; navigation and lateral approach were not found to be associated with a significant reduction in risk. For the anterior approach, multivariate analysis demonstrated that fluoroscopy significantly reduced dislocation risk (OR: 0.1), while DM, robotics, and navigation were not significant. For the posterior approach, the dislocation risk was lower with robotics than with conventional (OR: 0.2); the use of navigation or DM did not demonstrate a significant reduction in risk. Conclusions: The use of robotics was associated with a reduction in dislocations for this cohort overall. Further, fluoroscopy in the anterior approach and robotic assistance in the posterior approach were both associated with decreased dislocation risk. The role of imageless computer navigation and DM implants requires further study. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:S359 / S366
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Hepinstall, Matthew S.
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 45 (04) : 443 - +
  • [2] Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve?
    Kamara, Eli
    Robinson, Jonathon
    Bas, Marcel A.
    Rodriguez, Jose A.
    Hepinstall, Matthew S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (01) : 125 - 130
  • [3] Robotic Assistance for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Lower Risk of Revision for Dislocation When Compared to Manual Techniques
    Bendich, Ilya
    Vigdorchik, Jonathan M.
    Sharma, Abhi K.
    Mayman, David J.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    Anderson, Chris
    Della Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez
    Su, Edwin P.
    Jerabek, Seth A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (06) : 1124 - 1129
  • [4] Late Dislocations After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is the Bearing a Factor?
    Shah, Siddharth M.
    Walter, William L.
    Tai, Stephen M.
    Lorimer, Michelle F.
    de Steiger, Richard N.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (09) : 2852 - 2856
  • [5] Robotic-Assistance in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Decreased Dislocation Rates
    Swartz, Gabrielle N.
    Bains, Sandeep S.
    Dubin, Jeremy A.
    Katanbaf, Reza
    Hayes, Hunter
    Nace, James
    Mont, Michael A.
    Delanois, Ronald E.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2024, 30
  • [6] Current concepts in robotic total hip arthroplasty
    Kouyoumdjian, Pascal
    Mansour, Jad
    Assi, Chahine
    Caton, Jacques
    Lustig, Sebastien
    Coulomb, Remy
    SICOT-J, 2020, 6
  • [7] Total Hip Arthroplasty with Robotic Arm Assistance for Precise Cup Positioning: A Case-Control Study
    Guo, Dong-hui
    Li, Xiao-ming
    Ma, Shi-qiang
    Zhao, Yun-chao
    Qi, Chao
    Xue, Yuan
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (07) : 1498 - 1505
  • [8] Functional implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty and the role of robotic-arm assistance
    Fontalis, Andreas
    Raj, Rhody David
    Kim, Woo Jae
    Gabr, Ayman
    Glod, Fabrice
    Foissey, Constant
    Kayani, Babar
    Putzeys, Pierre
    Haddad, Fares S.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (02) : 573 - 584
  • [9] The Learning Curve Associated With Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Redmond, John M.
    Gupta, Asheesh
    Hammarstedt, Jon E.
    Petrakos, Alexandra E.
    Finch, Nathan A.
    Domb, Benjamin G.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (01) : 50 - 54
  • [10] Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty and the Role of Advanced and Robotic Technology
    Flick, Travis R.
    Ross, Bailey J.
    Sherman, William F.
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 52 (03) : 191 - 200