A 2-year prospective evaluation of the Prostate Health Index in guiding biopsy decisions in a large cohort

被引:0
作者
Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung [1 ]
Liu, Alex Qinyang [1 ]
Lau, Sui-Yan [1 ]
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun [1 ]
Ho, Chi-Chun [2 ]
Yee, Chi-Hang [1 ]
Hou, See-Ming [1 ]
Chan, Chi-Kwok [1 ]
Tang, Wai-Lun [2 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [4 ]
Chu, Peggy Sau-Kwan [3 ]
Poon, Wing-Tat [2 ]
Ng, Chi-Fai [1 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, SH Ho Urol Ctr, Dept Surg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hosp, Dept Pathol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Tuen Mun Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
prostate cancer; Prostate Health Index; prostate-specific antigen; -2]proPSA; biomarkers; screening; diagnosis; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CANCER DETECTION; ANTIGEN; RISK; MULTICENTER; VALIDATION; NOMOGRAM;
D O I
10.1111/bju.16457
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo prospectively evaluate how the Prostate Health Index (PHI) impacts on clinical decision in a real-life setting for men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level between 4 and 10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. Patients and MethodsSince 2016, the PHI has been available at no cost to eligible men in all Hong Kong public hospitals. All eligible patients who received PHI testing in all public Urology units (n = 16) in Hong Kong between May 2016 and August 2017 were prospectively included and followed up. All included men had a PHI test, with its result and implications explained; the subsequent follow-up plan was then decided via shared decision-making with urologists. Patients were followed up for 2 years, with outcomes including prostate biopsy rates and biopsy findings analysed in relation to the initial PHI measurements. ResultsA total of 2828 patients were followed up for 2 years. The majority (82%) had PHI results in the lower risk range (score <35). Knowing the PHI findings, 83% of the patients with elevated PSA decided not to undergo biopsy. In all, 11% and 45% opted for biopsy in the PHI score <35 and >= 35 groups, respectively. The initial detection rate of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) >= 2 cancer was higher in the PHI score >= 35 group (23%) than in the PHI score <35 group (7.9%). Amongst patients with no initial positive biopsy findings, the subsequent positive biopsy rate for ISUP GG >= 2 cancer was higher in the PHI score >= 35 group (34%) than the PHI score <35 group (13%) with a median follow-up of 2.4 years. ConclusionIn a real-life setting, with the PHI incorporated into the routine clinical pathway, 83% of the patients with elevated PSA level decided not to undergo prostate biopsy. The PHI pathway also improved the high-grade prostate cancer detection rate when compared to PSA-driven strategies. Higher baseline PHI predicted subsequent biopsy outcome at 2 years. The PHI can serve as a tool to individualise biopsy decisions and frequency of follow-up visits.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 77
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Economic evaluation of the introduction of the Prostate Health Index as a rule-out test to avoid unnecessary biopsies in men with prostate specific antigen levels of 4-10 in Hong Kong [J].
Bouttell, Janet ;
Teoh, Jeremy ;
Chiu, Peter K. ;
Chan, Kevin S. ;
Ng, Chi-Fai ;
Heggie, Robert ;
Hawkins, Neil .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04)
[2]   A Multicenter Study of [-2]Pro-Prostate Specific Antigen Combined With Prostate Specific Antigen and Free Prostate Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml Prostate Specific Antigen Range [J].
Catalona, William J. ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
Wei, John T. ;
Klee, George G. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Slawin, Kevin M. ;
Marks, Leonard S. ;
Loeb, Stacy ;
Broyles, Dennis L. ;
Shin, Sanghyuk S. ;
Cruz, Amabelle B. ;
Chan, Daniel W. ;
Sokoll, Lori J. ;
Roberts, William L. ;
van Schaik, Ron H. N. ;
Mizrahi, Isaac A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (05) :1650-1655
[3]   Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer [J].
Chiu, Peter K. ;
Alberts, Arnout R. ;
Venderbos, Lionne D. F. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (03) :394-400
[4]   Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume [J].
Chiu, Peter K. F. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Teoh, Jeremy Y. ;
Lee, Wai-Man ;
Yip, Siu-Ying ;
Hou, See-Ming ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Ng, Chi-Fai .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 48 (10) :1631-1637
[5]   A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings [J].
Chiu, Peter K-F ;
Ng, Chi-Fai ;
Semjonow, Axel ;
Zhu, Yao ;
Vincendeau, Sibastien ;
Houlgatte, Alain ;
Lazzeri, Massimo ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Stephan, Carsten ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Bruijne, Ilse ;
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun ;
Leung, Chi Ho ;
Casale, Paola ;
Chiang, Chih Hung ;
Tan, Lincoln Guan-Lim ;
Chiong, Edmund ;
Huang, Chao Yuan ;
Wu, Hsi Chin ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Ye, Ding-Wei ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (04) :558-561
[6]   Can active surveillance really reduce the harms of overdiagnosing prostate cancer? A reflection of real life clinical practice in the PRIAS study [J].
Drost, Frank-Jan H. ;
Rannikko, Antti ;
Valdagni, Riccardo ;
Pickles, Tom ;
Kakehi, Yoshiyuki ;
Remmers, Sebastiaan ;
van der Poel, Henk G. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (01) :98-+
[7]   Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer [J].
Druskin, Sasha C. ;
Tosoian, Jeffrey J. ;
Young, Allen ;
Collica, Sarah ;
Srivastava, Arnav ;
Ghabili, Kamyar ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Sokoll, Lori J. ;
Ross, Ashley E. ;
Pavlovich, Christian P. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (04) :619-626
[8]   The Cost-Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Detection with the Use of Prostate Health Index [J].
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. ;
Denham, Dwight ;
de Koning, Harry J. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (02) :153-157
[9]   Initial Prostate Health Index (phi) and phi density predicts future risk of clinically significant prostate cancer in men with initial negative prostate biopsy: a 6-year follow-up study [J].
Liu, Alex Qinyang ;
Remmers, Sebastiaan ;
Lau, Sui-Yan ;
Yip, Siu-Ying ;
Leung, Chi-Ho ;
Mak, Christy Wing-Hin ;
Yee, Chi-Hang ;
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun ;
Hou, See-Ming ;
Roobol, Monique ;
Ng, Chi-Fai ;
Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2022, 25 (04) :684-689
[10]   Multicenter European External Validation of a Prostate Health Index-based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer at Extended Biopsy [J].
Lughezzani, Giovanni ;
Lazzeri, Massimo ;
Haese, Alexander ;
McNicholas, Thomas ;
de la Taille, Alexandre ;
Buffi, Nicolo Maria ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Lista, Giuliana ;
Larcher, Alessandro ;
Abrate, Alberto ;
Mistretta, Alessandro ;
Bini, Vittorio ;
Redorta, Joan Palou ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (05) :906-912