A MULTI-FIDELITY APPROACH FOR RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT BASED ON THE PROBABILITY OF MODEL INCONSISTENCY

被引:0
作者
Pidaparthi, Bharath [1 ]
Missoum, Samy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Aerosp & Mech Engn Dept, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, IDETC-CIE2022, VOL 3B | 2022年
关键词
Reliability Assessment; Probability of Failure; Multi-fidelity; Support Vector Machines; Probability of Model Inconsistency; Heat Exchangers; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Most multi-fidelity schemes rely on regression surrogates, such as Gaussian Processes, to combine low- and high-fidelity data. Contrary to these approaches, we propose a classification-based multi-fidelity scheme for reliability assessment. This multi-fidelity technique leverages low- and high-fidelity model evaluations to locally construct the failure boundaries using support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. These SVMs can subsequently be used to estimate the probability of failure using Monte Carlo Simulations. At the core of this multi-fidelity scheme is an adaptive sampling routine driven by the probability of misclassification. This sampling routine explores sparsely sampled regions of inconsistency between low- and high-fidelity models to iteratively refine the SVM approximation of the failure boundaries. A lookahead check, which looks one step into the future without any model evaluations, is employed to selectively filter the adaptive samples. A novel model selection framework, which adaptively defines a neighborhood of no confidence around low fidelity model, is used in this study to determine if the adaptive samples should be evaluated with high- or low-fidelity model. The proposed multi-fidelity scheme is tested on a few analytical examples of dimensions ranging from 2 to 10, and finally applied to assess the reliability of a miniature shell and tube heat exchanger.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, N Y
[2]   Adaptive explicit decision functions for probabilistic design and optimization using support vector machines [J].
Basudhar, Anirban ;
Missoum, Samy .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2008, 86 (19-20) :1904-1917
[3]   An improved adaptive sampling scheme for the construction of explicit boundaries [J].
Basudhar, Anirban ;
Missoum, Samy .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 42 (04) :517-529
[4]   Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions [J].
Bichon, B. J. ;
Eldred, M. S. ;
Swiler, L. P. ;
Mahadevan, S. ;
McFarland, J. M. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2008, 46 (10) :2459-2468
[5]   mfEGRA: Multifidelity efficient global reliability analysis through active learning for failure boundary location [J].
Chaudhuri, Anirban ;
Marques, Alexandre N. ;
Willcox, Karen .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2021, 64 (02) :797-811
[6]  
Ditlevsen OD, 1996, Structural Reliability Methods
[7]  
Dribusch C., 2012, 53 AIAA ASME ASCE AH, P1803
[8]   A multifidelity approach for the construction of explicit decision boundaries: application to aeroelasticity [J].
Dribusch, Christoph ;
Missoum, Samy ;
Beran, Philip .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 42 (05) :693-705
[9]   AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation [J].
Echard, B. ;
Gayton, N. ;
Lemaire, M. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2011, 33 (02) :145-154
[10]  
Edwards J., 2008, Design and rating shell and tube heat exchangers