How automotive OEMs can lever platform-based ecosystems through the strategic use of boundary resources

被引:1
作者
Buck, Christoph [1 ,2 ]
Watkowski, Laura [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Augsburg, Branch Business & Informat Syst, Engn Fraunhofer FIT, Wittelsbacherring 10, D-95444 Bayreuth, Germany
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, QUT Gardens Point Campus,2 George St, Brisbane City, Qld 4000, Australia
[3] Univ Bayreuth, Res Ctr Finance & Informat Management, Branch Business & Informat Syst, Engn Fraunhofer FIT, Wittelsbacherring 10, D-95444 Bayreuth, Germany
关键词
selective revealing; strategic revealing; resource revealing; boundary resources; platform based; software platform; ecosystem; platform governance; automotive OEM; car manufacturer; product focused; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE-REVIEWS; OPEN INNOVATION; VALUE CREATION; DIGITAL PLATFORMS; KNOWLEDGE; PRODUCT; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; ARCHITECTURE; COOPERATION;
D O I
10.1504/IJATM.2023.133354
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
While platform-based ecosystems have drawn massive attention, the focus has primarily been on the platform development, architecture and governance of digital native firms. Nonetheless, mainly product-focused industries are suffering severe changes in how value is perceived by consumers. Thus, they sense an urgent need for change toward establishing platform-based ecosystems in order to survive and remain competitive. As recognised in the automotive industry, OEMs miss fruitful guidance on how to make their resources strategically available to external actors and how to manage them to profit from complements and knowledge spill-overs. Once opened, resources are harder to control; thus, automotive OEMs fear hostile misuse. Based on a systematic literature review, we derive state-of-the-art knowledge concerning the strategic use of boundary resources (BRs). Further, we provide insights through interviews with experts on how to cope with the tensions of openness of resources to enhance platform-based ecosystems' value.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 194
页数:25
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Network management in the era of ecosystems: Systematic review and management framework [J].
Aarikka-Stenroos, Leena ;
Ritala, Paavo .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2017, 67 :23-36
[2]   Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy [J].
Adner, Ron .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (01) :39-58
[3]   VALUE CREATION IN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS: HOW THE STRUCTURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE IN NEW TECHNOLOGY GENERATIONS [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :306-333
[4]   CUI BONO? THE SELECTIVE REVEALING OF KNOWLEDGE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY [J].
Alexy, Oliver ;
George, Gerard ;
Salter, Ammon J. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 (02) :270-291
[5]   ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE AND THE BIRTH OF A PLATFORM ECOSYSTEM: A CASE STUDY [J].
Attour, Amel ;
Barbaroux, Pierre .
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, 2016, (19) :11-30
[6]  
Batchelor J., 2001, International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, V1, P217
[7]  
BMW, 2022, ConnectedDrive
[8]  
Bogers M., 2012, Open Innovation in Firms and Public Administrations, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-341-6.ch001, DOI 10.4018/978-1-61350-341-6.CH001]
[10]   Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software App Developers and Patterns of Innovation [J].
Boudreau, Kevin J. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (05) :1409-1427