Long-Term Implant Fracture Rates Following Silicone Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Purpose The primary objective of this study was to compare the long-term survival rates of silicone metacarpophalangeal (MCP) arthroplasties between two major implants in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, using implant fracture as an end point. We also evaluated the difference in postoperative function between patients with fractured and intact implants as a secondary objective. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 372 fingers of 133 hands that underwent silicone MCP arthroplasty between January 2000 and June 2019 (mean follow-up, 7.6 years). The survival rates of Swanson -type and Sutter -type implants were compared, using implant fracture as the end point after a radiographic evaluation. Clinical measures and upper limb functional assessments using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score were performed in the nested cohort. Results The 10.6 -year survival rates for implant fracture of Swanson- and Sutter -type implants were 86.2% and 9.4%, respectively, with significantly higher survival noted for Swanson -type implants. The Sutter -type implant showed increased susceptibility to fracture in all four fingers compared to the Swanson -type implant. Implant fractures were primarily observed at the stem -hinge junction. There were no significant differences in upper limb function between the fractured and intact implant groups. Conclusions Sutter -type implants were found to be more prone to fracture compared with Swanson -type implants. However, implant fractures did not significantly affect upper limb function. Copyright (c) 2024 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).) Type of study/level of evidence Prognosis IV.