Using digital tools in clinical, health and social care research: a mixed-methods study of UK stakeholders

被引:1
|
作者
Clohessy, Sophie [1 ]
Arvanitis, Theodoros N. [2 ]
Rashid, Umer [1 ]
Craddock, Carly [3 ,4 ]
Evans, Mark [3 ,4 ]
Toro, Carla T. [5 ]
Elliott, Mark T. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, WMG, Coventry, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Engn, Birmingham, England
[3] Natl Inst Hlth Res Clin Res Network West Midlands, Birmingham, England
[4] Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, England
[5] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, Sch Sport Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Birmingham, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
Clinical Trial; Qualitative Research; Telemedicine;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076613
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated changes to clinical research methodology, with clinical studies being carried out via online/remote means. This mixed-methods study aimed to identify which digital tools are currently used across all stages of clinical research by stakeholders in clinical, health and social care research and investigate their experience using digital tools.Design Two online surveys followed by semistructured interviews were conducted. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.Setting, participants To explore the digital tools used since the pandemic, survey participants (researchers and related staff (n=41), research and development staff (n=25)), needed to have worked on clinical, health or social care research studies over the past 2 years (2020-2022) in an employing organisation based in the West Midlands region of England (due to funding from a regional clinical research network (CRN)). Survey participants had the opportunity to participate in an online qualitative interview to explore their experiences of digital tools in greater depth (n=8).Results Six themes were identified in the qualitative interviews: 'definition of a digital tool in clinical research'; 'impact of the COVID-19 pandemic'; 'perceived benefits/drawbacks of digital tools'; 'selection of a digital tool'; 'barriers and overcoming barriers' and 'future digital tool use'. The context of each theme is discussed, based on the interview results.Conclusions Findings demonstrate how digital tools are becoming embedded in clinical research, as well as the breadth of tools used across different research stages. The majority of participants viewed the tools positively, noting their ability to enhance research efficiency. Several considerations were highlighted; concerns about digital exclusion; need for collaboration with digital expertise/clinical staff, research on tool effectiveness and recommendations to aid future tool selection. There is a need for the development of resources to help optimise the selection and use of appropriate digital tools for clinical research staff and participants.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of genetics clinical decision support tools on health-care providers' decision making: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Sebastian, Agnes
    Carroll, June C.
    Oldfield, Leslie E.
    Mighton, Chloe
    Shickh, Salma
    Uleryk, Elizabeth
    Bombard, Yvonne
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (04) : 593 - 602
  • [42] Deciphering Latent Health Information in Social Media Using a Mixed-Methods Design
    Shaw Jr, George
    Zimmerman, Margaret
    Vasquez-Huot, Ligia
    Karami, Amir
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (11)
  • [43] Credible Phenomenological Research: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Flynn, Stephen V.
    Korcuska, James S.
    COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION, 2018, 57 (01) : 34 - 50
  • [44] Findability of UK health datasets available for research: a mixed methods study
    Griffiths, Emily
    Joseph, Rebecca M.
    Tilston, George
    Thew, Sarah
    Kapacee, Zoher
    Dixon, William
    Peek, Niels
    BMJ HEALTH & CARE INFORMATICS, 2022, 29 (01)
  • [45] The Promise of Mixed-Methods for Advancing Latino Health Research
    Apesoa-Varano E.C.
    Hinton L.
    Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 2013, 28 (3) : 267 - 282
  • [46] Mixed-Methods Research in Primary Care: Experiences From a Mental Health Trial in Tunisia
    Spagnolo, Jessica
    Champagne, Francois
    Leduc, Nicole
    Melki, Wahid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2018, 17 (01): : 30 - 30
  • [47] Advancing Spiritual Care Research in Psychosocial Oncology: Example of a Mixed-Methods Study
    Dunn, Laura
    Kestenbaum, Allison
    Rabow, Michael
    Hocker, Will
    Dohan, Daniel
    James, Jennifer
    Shields, Michele
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 : 51 - 51
  • [48] Mixed-Methods Research in the Study of Welfare States
    Niedzwiecki, Sara
    Nunnally, David
    PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2017, 50 (04) : 1028 - 1031
  • [49] Using mixed-methods research to study the quality of life of coeliac women
    Rodriguez Almagro, Julian
    Hernandez Martinez, Antonio
    Solano Ruiz, Maria Carmen
    Siles Gonzalez, Jose
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2017, 26 (7-8) : 1119 - 1130
  • [50] Applications of mixed-methods methodology in clinical pharmacy research
    Muhammad Abdul Hadi
    S. José Closs
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2016, 38 : 635 - 640