Using digital tools in clinical, health and social care research: a mixed-methods study of UK stakeholders

被引:1
|
作者
Clohessy, Sophie [1 ]
Arvanitis, Theodoros N. [2 ]
Rashid, Umer [1 ]
Craddock, Carly [3 ,4 ]
Evans, Mark [3 ,4 ]
Toro, Carla T. [5 ]
Elliott, Mark T. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, WMG, Coventry, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Engn, Birmingham, England
[3] Natl Inst Hlth Res Clin Res Network West Midlands, Birmingham, England
[4] Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, England
[5] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, Sch Sport Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Birmingham, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
Clinical Trial; Qualitative Research; Telemedicine;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076613
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated changes to clinical research methodology, with clinical studies being carried out via online/remote means. This mixed-methods study aimed to identify which digital tools are currently used across all stages of clinical research by stakeholders in clinical, health and social care research and investigate their experience using digital tools.Design Two online surveys followed by semistructured interviews were conducted. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.Setting, participants To explore the digital tools used since the pandemic, survey participants (researchers and related staff (n=41), research and development staff (n=25)), needed to have worked on clinical, health or social care research studies over the past 2 years (2020-2022) in an employing organisation based in the West Midlands region of England (due to funding from a regional clinical research network (CRN)). Survey participants had the opportunity to participate in an online qualitative interview to explore their experiences of digital tools in greater depth (n=8).Results Six themes were identified in the qualitative interviews: 'definition of a digital tool in clinical research'; 'impact of the COVID-19 pandemic'; 'perceived benefits/drawbacks of digital tools'; 'selection of a digital tool'; 'barriers and overcoming barriers' and 'future digital tool use'. The context of each theme is discussed, based on the interview results.Conclusions Findings demonstrate how digital tools are becoming embedded in clinical research, as well as the breadth of tools used across different research stages. The majority of participants viewed the tools positively, noting their ability to enhance research efficiency. Several considerations were highlighted; concerns about digital exclusion; need for collaboration with digital expertise/clinical staff, research on tool effectiveness and recommendations to aid future tool selection. There is a need for the development of resources to help optimise the selection and use of appropriate digital tools for clinical research staff and participants.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mixed-methods research on diabetes patient health education using digital technologies
    Cencic, Ajda
    Prosen, Mirko
    Licen, Sabina
    KONTAKT-JOURNAL OF NURSING AND SOCIAL SCIENCES RELATED TO HEALTH AND ILLNESS, 2022, 24 (02): : 123 - 130
  • [2] Alignment of Key Stakeholders' Priorities for Patient-Facing Tools in Digital Health: Mixed Methods Study
    Lyles, Courtney Rees
    Adler-Milstein, Julia
    Thao, Crishyashi
    Lisker, Sarah
    Nouri, Sarah
    Sarkar, Urmimala
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (08)
  • [3] Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Universal Screening of Social Determinants of Health: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Kostelanetz, Sophia
    Pettapiece-Phillips, Mariah
    Weems, Jacy
    Spalding, Tamarra
    Roumie, Christianne
    Wilkins, Consuelo H.
    Kripalani, Sunil
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2022, 25 (03) : 367 - 374
  • [4] Identifying and prioritising future interventions with stakeholders to improve paediatric urgent care pathways in Scotland, UK: a mixed-methods study
    King, Emma
    France, Emma
    Malcolm, Cari
    Kumar, Simita
    Dick, Smita
    Kyle, Richard G.
    Wilson, Philip
    Aucott, Lorna
    Turner, Stephen
    Hoddinott, Pat
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [5] COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours among health and social care workers in the UK: A mixed-methods study
    Bell, Sadie
    Clarke, Richard M.
    Ismail, Sharif A.
    Ojo-Aromokudu, Oyinkansola
    Naqvi, Habib
    Coghill, Yvonne
    Donovan, Helen
    Letley, Louise
    Paterson, Pauline
    Mounier-Jack, Sandra
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [6] Digital literacy education for UK undergraduate pharmacy students: a mixed-methods study
    Alowais, Mashael
    Nazar, Hamde
    Tolley, Clare
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2024, 32 (05) : 413 - 419
  • [7] Quality of Care and Stakeholders' Perceptions of PEC Implementation in Singapore: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
    Yip, Wanfen
    Pereira, Michelle Jessica
    Molina, Joseph Antonio De Castro
    Tan, Woan Shin
    Teow, Kiok Liang
    Hui, Vivien Yip Cherng
    Yau, Vernon Yong Khet
    Wong, Hon Tym
    Lim, Tock Han
    Heng, Bee Hoon
    OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [8] Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study
    Paddock, Katie
    Woolfall, Kerry
    Kearney, Anna
    Pattison, Natalie
    Frith, Lucy
    Gamble, Carrol
    Welters, Ingeborg
    Trinder, John
    Young, Bridget
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [9] Visualization in Mixed-Methods Research on Social Networks
    D'Angelo, Alessi
    Ryan, Louise
    Tubaro, Paola
    SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE, 2016, 21 (02): : 148 - 151
  • [10] Fitting a square peg in a round hole? A mixed-methods study on research ethics and collaborative health and social care research involving 'vulnerable' groups
    De Poli, Chiara
    Oyebode, Jan
    Airoldi, Mara
    Stevens, Martin
    Capstick, Andrea
    Mays, Nicholas
    Clark, Michael
    Driessen, Annelieke
    Rivas, Carol
    Penhale, Bridget
    Fletcher, James R.
    Russell, Amy M.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2025, 23 (01):