Towards an AI-Based Objective Prognostic Model for Quantifying Wound Healing

被引:6
作者
Gupta, Rishabh [1 ]
Goldstone, Lucas [1 ]
Eisen, Shira [1 ]
Ramachandram, Dhanesh [1 ]
Cassata, Amy [1 ]
Fraser, Robert D. J. [1 ]
Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Jose L. [1 ]
Bartlett, Robert [1 ]
Allport, Justin [1 ]
机构
[1] Swift Med Inc, Toronto, ON M5H 3W4, Canada
关键词
Chronic wounds; prognosis; health monitoring; contactless monitoring; wound imaging; PRESSURE ULCER SCALE; FRAMEWORK; ACCURACY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/JBHI.2023.3251901
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Chronic wounds affect millions of people worldwide every year. An adequate assessment of a wound's prognosis is critical to wound care, guiding clinical decision making by helping clinicians understand wound healing status, severity, triaging and determining the efficacy of a treatment regimen. The current standard of care involves using wound assessment tools, such as Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) and Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT), to determine wound prognosis. However, these tools involve manual assessment of a multitude of wound characteristics and skilled consideration of a variety of factors, thus, making wound prognosis a slow process which is prone to misinterpretation and high degree of variability. Therefore, in this work we have explored the viability of replacing subjective clinical information with deep learning-based objective features derived from wound images, pertaining to wound area and tissue amounts. These objective features were used to train prognostic models that quantified the risk of delayed wound healing, using a dataset consisting of 2.1 million wound evaluations derived from more than 200,000 wounds. The objective model, which was trained exclusively using image-based objective features, achieved at minimum a 5% and 9% improvement over PUSH and BWAT, respectively. Our best performing model, that used both subjective and objective features, achieved at minimum an 8% and 13% improvement over PUSH and BWAT, respectively. Moreover, the reported models consistently outperformed the standard tools across various clinical settings, wound etiologies, sexes, age groups and wound ages, thus establishing the generalizability of the models.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 677
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network
    Katzman, Jared L.
    Shaham, Uri
    Cloninger, Alexander
    Bates, Jonathan
    Jiang, Tingting
    Kluger, Yuval
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [22] MEASURE: A proposed assessment framework for developing best practice recommendations for wound assessment
    Keast, DH
    Bowering, CK
    Evans, AW
    Mackean, GL
    Burrows, C
    D'Souza, L
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2004, 12 (03) : S1 - S17
  • [23] Utilization of smartphone and tablet camera photographs to predict healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers
    Kim, Renaid B.
    Gryak, Jonathan
    Mishra, Abinash
    Cui, Can
    Soroushmehr, S. M. Reza
    Najarian, Kayvan
    Wrobel, James S.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2020, 126
  • [24] Krasner D, 1997, Adv Wound Care, V10, P82
  • [25] DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT OF WOUNDS AND EVALUATION OF HEALING
    LAZARUS, GS
    COOPER, DM
    KNIGHTON, DR
    MARGOLIS, DJ
    PECORARO, RE
    RODEHEAVER, G
    ROBSON, MC
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1994, 130 (04) : 489 - 493
  • [26] Long J, 2015, PROC CVPR IEEE, P3431, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965
  • [27] McNichol LL., 2021, Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society Core Curriculum: Wound Management, V2nd
  • [28] A time motion study of manual versus artificial intelligence methods for wound assessment
    Mohammed, Heba Tallah
    Bartlett, Robert L.
    Babb, Deborah
    Fraser, Robert D. J.
    Mannion, David
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (07):
  • [29] What factors influence the prevalence and accuracy of nursing diagnoses documentation in clinical practice? A systematic literature review
    Paans, Wolter
    Nieweg, Roos M. B.
    van der Schans, Cees P.
    Sermeus, Walter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2011, 20 (17-18) : 2386 - 2403
  • [30] Pillen H, 2009, WOUND PRACT RES, V17, P208