Towards an AI-Based Objective Prognostic Model for Quantifying Wound Healing

被引:6
作者
Gupta, Rishabh [1 ]
Goldstone, Lucas [1 ]
Eisen, Shira [1 ]
Ramachandram, Dhanesh [1 ]
Cassata, Amy [1 ]
Fraser, Robert D. J. [1 ]
Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Jose L. [1 ]
Bartlett, Robert [1 ]
Allport, Justin [1 ]
机构
[1] Swift Med Inc, Toronto, ON M5H 3W4, Canada
关键词
Chronic wounds; prognosis; health monitoring; contactless monitoring; wound imaging; PRESSURE ULCER SCALE; FRAMEWORK; ACCURACY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/JBHI.2023.3251901
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Chronic wounds affect millions of people worldwide every year. An adequate assessment of a wound's prognosis is critical to wound care, guiding clinical decision making by helping clinicians understand wound healing status, severity, triaging and determining the efficacy of a treatment regimen. The current standard of care involves using wound assessment tools, such as Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) and Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT), to determine wound prognosis. However, these tools involve manual assessment of a multitude of wound characteristics and skilled consideration of a variety of factors, thus, making wound prognosis a slow process which is prone to misinterpretation and high degree of variability. Therefore, in this work we have explored the viability of replacing subjective clinical information with deep learning-based objective features derived from wound images, pertaining to wound area and tissue amounts. These objective features were used to train prognostic models that quantified the risk of delayed wound healing, using a dataset consisting of 2.1 million wound evaluations derived from more than 200,000 wounds. The objective model, which was trained exclusively using image-based objective features, achieved at minimum a 5% and 9% improvement over PUSH and BWAT, respectively. Our best performing model, that used both subjective and objective features, achieved at minimum an 8% and 13% improvement over PUSH and BWAT, respectively. Moreover, the reported models consistently outperformed the standard tools across various clinical settings, wound etiologies, sexes, age groups and wound ages, thus establishing the generalizability of the models.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 677
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] Time-dependent covariates in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model
    Fisher, LD
    Lin, DY
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 20 : 145 - 157
  • [12] Fraser R. D., 2022, J. Wound Manage., V13, P87
  • [13] Inter-rater reliability assessment of new diabetic foot ulcers (The Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment Scale) based on photograph
    Haeruddin, Hasniati
    Yusuf, Saldy
    Patellongi, Ilhamjaya
    Rasid, Kaharuddin Abdul
    Harkam, Harbaeni
    Supardi, Edy
    [J]. ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2020, 30 : 433 - 438
  • [14] EVALUATING THE YIELD OF MEDICAL TESTS
    HARRELL, FE
    CALIFF, RM
    PRYOR, DB
    LEE, KL
    ROSATI, RA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 247 (18): : 2543 - 2546
  • [15] Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves
    Heagerty, PJ
    Zheng, YY
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (01) : 92 - 105
  • [16] Checklist for Factors Affecting Wound Healing
    Hess, Cathy Thomas
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2011, 24 (04) : 192 - 192
  • [17] Hon J, 2010, OSTOMY WOUND MANAG, V56, P26
  • [18] Houghton P E, 2000, Ostomy Wound Manage, V46, P20
  • [19] Use of the SINBAD classification system and score in comparing outcome of foot ulcer management on three continents
    Ince, Paul
    Abbas, Zulfiqarali G.
    Lutale, Janet K.
    Basit, Abdul
    Ali, Syed Mansoor
    Chohan, Farooq
    Morbach, Stephan
    Moellenberg, Joerg
    Game, Fran L.
    Jeffcoate, William J.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 (05) : 964 - 967
  • [20] RANDOM SURVIVAL FORESTS
    Ishwaran, Hemant
    Kogalur, Udaya B.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Lauer, Michael S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2008, 2 (03) : 841 - 860