Towards an AI-Based Objective Prognostic Model for Quantifying Wound Healing

被引:6
作者
Gupta, Rishabh [1 ]
Goldstone, Lucas [1 ]
Eisen, Shira [1 ]
Ramachandram, Dhanesh [1 ]
Cassata, Amy [1 ]
Fraser, Robert D. J. [1 ]
Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Jose L. [1 ]
Bartlett, Robert [1 ]
Allport, Justin [1 ]
机构
[1] Swift Med Inc, Toronto, ON M5H 3W4, Canada
关键词
Chronic wounds; prognosis; health monitoring; contactless monitoring; wound imaging; PRESSURE ULCER SCALE; FRAMEWORK; ACCURACY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/JBHI.2023.3251901
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Chronic wounds affect millions of people worldwide every year. An adequate assessment of a wound's prognosis is critical to wound care, guiding clinical decision making by helping clinicians understand wound healing status, severity, triaging and determining the efficacy of a treatment regimen. The current standard of care involves using wound assessment tools, such as Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) and Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT), to determine wound prognosis. However, these tools involve manual assessment of a multitude of wound characteristics and skilled consideration of a variety of factors, thus, making wound prognosis a slow process which is prone to misinterpretation and high degree of variability. Therefore, in this work we have explored the viability of replacing subjective clinical information with deep learning-based objective features derived from wound images, pertaining to wound area and tissue amounts. These objective features were used to train prognostic models that quantified the risk of delayed wound healing, using a dataset consisting of 2.1 million wound evaluations derived from more than 200,000 wounds. The objective model, which was trained exclusively using image-based objective features, achieved at minimum a 5% and 9% improvement over PUSH and BWAT, respectively. Our best performing model, that used both subjective and objective features, achieved at minimum an 8% and 13% improvement over PUSH and BWAT, respectively. Moreover, the reported models consistently outperformed the standard tools across various clinical settings, wound etiologies, sexes, age groups and wound ages, thus establishing the generalizability of the models.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 677
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Adderley Una J, 2010, Br J Community Nurs, V15, pS15
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis
  • [3] Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study
    Bates-Jensen, Barbara M.
    McCreath, Heather E.
    Harputlu, Deniz
    Patlan, Anabel
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2019, 27 (04) : 386 - 395
  • [4] Calianno Carol A, 2006, Adv Skin Wound Care, V19, P6, DOI 10.1097/00129334-200607000-00008
  • [5] Automatic wound detection and size estimation using deep learning algorithms
    Carrion, Hector
    Jafari, Mohammad
    Bagood, Michelle Dawn
    Yang, Hsin-ya
    Isseroff, Roslyn Rivkah
    Gomez, Marcella
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 18 (03)
  • [6] Reliability and Validity of the Perfusion, Extent, Depth, Infection and Sensation (PEDIS) Classification System and Score in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer
    Chuan, Fengning
    Tang, Kang
    Jiang, Peng
    Zhou, Bo
    He, Xiaoqun
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [7] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [8] Explorations in statistics: the log transformation
    Curran-Everett, Douglas
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2018, 42 (02) : 343 - 347
  • [9] Davidson-Pilon C., 2019, J Open Source Softw, V4, P1317, DOI [10.21105/joss.01317, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.01317]
  • [10] THE SESSING SCALE FOR ASSESSMENT OF PRESSURE ULCER HEALING
    FERRELL, BA
    ARTINIAN, BM
    SESSING, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1995, 43 (01) : 37 - 40