Safety assessment of using macintosh laryngoscope, airtraq, I-view, UESCOPE by non-clinically experienced individuals on a manikin model: A randomized cross-over study

被引:0
作者
Ratajczyk, Pawel [1 ]
Kluj, Przemyslaw [1 ]
Wasiak, Krzysztof [1 ]
Szmyd, Bartosz [2 ]
Baginska, Karolina [1 ]
Gaszynski, Tomasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Lodz, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Therapy, Lodz, Poland
[2] Med Univ Lodz, Dept Neurosurg & Neuro Oncol, Lodz, Poland
关键词
Endotracheal intubation; Video laryngoscopes; Mannequin study; INTUBATION SUCCESS; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; OROTRACHEAL INTUBATION; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; INTENSIVE-CARE; ANESTHESIA; SIMULATORS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tacc.2024.101361
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Endotracheal intubation is the best way of restoring airway patency. Covid-19 epidemic showed that the health professionals without previous experience may be forced to use this technique in the state of necessity, exposing the patients to both local and systemic complications. In our study we wanted to specify which of the four laryngoscopes is safer for a patient when used by this group of medical staff. Methods: The study involved 55 4th year students of Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry who had never previously practiced using videolaryngoscopes and had minimal experience with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Results: Dental injury rates: Macintosh (n = 18, 33 %), I-View (n = 13, 24 %), UESCOPE (n = 10, 18 %), and Airtraq (n = 7, 13 %), though differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.071). Notable variations were observed in maximum pressure: I-View (88.9 mmHg, IQR: 72.75-106.5), Macintosh (87.1 mmHg, IQR: 75.1-110.35), UESCOPE (72.7 mmHg, IQR: 61-86), and Airtraq (54.7 mmHg, IQR: 41.8-67.25). The difference between Macintosh and I-View was not significant. Pressure during intubation showed a similar trend: Macintosh (48.3 mmHg, IQR: 42.85-59.4), I-View (45.2 mmHg, IQR: 35.7-54.85), UESCOPE (33 mmHg, IQR: 27.95-41.5), Airtraq (21.6 mmHg, IQR: 18.4-24.9). Airtraq usage correlated with shorter intubation times (9.9 s, IQR: 8.4-12.25) compared to Macintosh (27 s, IQR: 23.8-32.05), I-View (24.5 s, IQR: 19.25-31.35), and UESCOPE (23.6 s, IQR: 17-29.5). Airtraq was the best-rated device by respondents. Airway visualization was superior with Airtraq, as assessed by Cormack-Lehane and POGO scales. On the Cormack-Lehane scale, Airtraq scored 2 (IQR: 2-2), versus Macintosh (3, IQR: 3-3), I-View (2, IQR: 2-3), and UESCOPE (2, IQR: 2-3). On the POGO scale, Airtraq scored 70 % (IQR: 60%-90 %), compared to Macintosh (30 %, IQR: 20%-30 %), I-View (60 %, IQR: 30%- 60 %), and UESCOPE (50 %, IQR: 30%-70 %) Conclusions: Airtraq laryngoscope on a mannequin model turned out to be device that damages the teeth the least, exerts the lowest pressure on the tongue and giving the possibility of the fastest intubation with the greatest comfort for the operator in the studied group of users.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   The pressure exerted on the tongue during intubation with simultaneous cervical spine immobilisation: a comparison between four videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope-a manikin study [J].
Aleksandrowicz, Dawid ;
Gaszynski, Tomasz .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2018, 32 (05) :907-913
[2]   Impact of Videolaryngoscopy Expertise on First-Attempt Intubation Success in Critically Ill Patients [J].
Amalric, Matthieu ;
Larcher, Romaric ;
Brunot, Vincent ;
Garnier, Fanny ;
De Jong, Audrey ;
Moulaire Rigollet, Valerie ;
Corne, Philippe ;
Klouche, Kada ;
Jung, Boris .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (10) :E889-E896
[3]   Force and pressure distribution using Macintosh and GlideScope laryngoscopes in normal and difficult airways: a manikin study [J].
Carassiti, M. ;
Zanzonico, R. ;
Cecchini, S. ;
Silvestri, S. ;
Cataldo, R. ;
Agro, F. E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 108 (01) :146-151
[4]   A national survey of the impact of NAP4 on airway management practice in United Kingdom hospitals: closing the safety gap in anaesthesia, intensive care and the emergency department [J].
Cook, T. M. ;
Woodall, N. ;
Frerk, C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 117 (02) :182-190
[5]   Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments [J].
Cook, T. M. ;
Woodall, N. ;
Harper, J. ;
Benger, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (05) :632-642
[6]   POGO score - Reply [J].
Levitan, RM ;
Ochroch, EA ;
Hollander, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2000, 47 (05) :477-478
[7]  
Cooper JB, 2008, POSTGRAD MED J, V84, P563, DOI 10.1136/qshc.2004.009886
[8]   Quantifying Intubation Forces on Incisors and Tongue Base Across Exposure Difficulty and Experience in a Simulator [J].
Davis, Gavin ;
Malka, Ronit E. ;
Moore, Austin ;
Cook, Stacy L. ;
Blackburn, Megan ;
Dion, Gregory R. .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
[9]  
Fukuda Taeko, 2011, Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, V49, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.aat.2011.02.001
[10]   Effect of paramedic experience on orotracheal intubation success rates [J].
Garza, AG ;
Gratton, MC ;
Coontz, D ;
Noble, E ;
Ma, OJ .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 25 (03) :251-256