Contact algorithm of the material point method and comparison with the finite element method

被引:0
作者
Huang, Peng [1 ]
Liu, Dong-huan [2 ]
Guo, Hu [1 ]
Xie, Ke [1 ]
Zhang, Qing-ping [1 ]
Deng, Zhi-fang [1 ]
机构
[1] China Acad Engn Phys, Inst Syst Engn, Mianyang 621900, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Math & Phys, Beijing Key Lab Magneto Photoelect Composite & Int, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Material point method; Contact algorithm; Finite element method; Impact problems; IMPACT; PENETRATION; SIMULATION; STRESS; MPM;
D O I
10.1007/s10596-024-10302-0
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Being a fully Lagrangian particle method, the material point method (MPM) discretizes a material domain by using a collection of material points. The momentum equations in MPM are solved on a predefined regular background grid, so that the grid distortion and entanglement are completely avoided in MPM. The contact algorithm of MPM is developed via the background grid and the impenetrability condition between bodies. The contact algorithm of MPM is applied to solve some impact and perforation problems. This study concerns the validation of the contact algorithm of MPM. Solutions from MPM with the contact algorithm are compared to those from the finite element method (FEM) with the penalty method. For two impact problems, the results from MPM with the contact algorithm are in good agreement with those obtained with the FEM penalty method. For the perforation problem of aluminum plate, the results obtained using MPM with the contact algorithm are better than those from the FEM penalty method. We think that for impact problems without extreme large deformations, it is better to use the FEM penalty method. For impact problems with extreme large deformations, it is better to use the contact algorithm of MPM.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1030
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Development of an implicit contact technique for the material point method [J].
Acosta, Jose Leon Gonzalez ;
Vardon, Philip J. ;
Hicks, Michael A. .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2021, 130 (130)
[2]  
Bardenhagen SG, 2001, CMES-COMP MODEL ENG, V2, P509
[3]   Energy conservation error in the material point method for solid mechanics [J].
Bardenhagen, SG .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2002, 180 (01) :383-403
[4]   The material-point method for granular materials [J].
Bardenhagen, SG ;
Brackbill, JU ;
Sulsky, D .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2000, 187 (3-4) :529-541
[5]   A general fluid-sediment mixture model and constitutive theory validated in many flow regimes [J].
Baumgarten, Aaron S. ;
Kamrin, Ken .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2019, 861 :721-764
[6]  
Belytschko T., 2001, NONLINEAR FINITE ELE
[7]   Modeling of impact problems using an h-adaptive, explicit Lagrangian finite element method in three dimensions [J].
Bessette, GC ;
Becker, EB ;
Taylor, LM ;
Littlefield, DL .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2003, 192 (13-14) :1649-1679
[8]   Shock induced void nucleation during Taylor impact [J].
Chapman, DJ ;
Radford, DD ;
Reynolds, M ;
Church, PD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2005, 134 (01) :41-57
[9]   Mesh objective simulations of large strain ductile fracture: A new nonlocal Johnson-Cook damage formulation for the Total Lagrangian Material Point Method [J].
de Vaucorbeil, Alban ;
Vinh Phu Nguyen ;
Mandal, Tushar Kanti .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 389
[10]   Continuum modeling of projectile impact and penetration in dry granular media [J].
Dunatunga, Sachith ;
Kamrin, Ken .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 2017, 100 :45-60