Exploring the effect of enterprise risk management for ESG risks towards green growth

被引:5
作者
Shah, Syed Quaid Ali [1 ]
Lai, Fong-Woon [2 ]
Shad, Muhammad Kashif [3 ]
Hamad, Salaheldin [4 ]
Ellili, Nejla Ould Daoud [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Management & Humanities, Philosophy PhD, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Management & Humanities, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
[3] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Finance Management & Humanities Dept, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
[4] Kafrelsheikh Univ, Fac Commerce, Kafr Al Sheikh, Egypt
[5] Abu Dhabi Univ, Coll Business Adm, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Enterprise risk management; Green growth; Environmental performance; Stakeholder theory; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; COMPANIES;
D O I
10.1108/IJPPM-10-2023-0582
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - Despite the growing emphasis on sustainability and the need to manage environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, the direct relationship between enterprise risk management (ERM) and green growth (GG) has not been investigated. This study seeks to fill this gap by examining the effect of ERM on the GG of oil and gas (O&G) companies in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach - The study used panel data regression models to analyze panel data from 2012 to 2021. For computing GG, we adapted the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD) GG framework. ERM is computed using COSO and WBCSD guidelines for ESG-related risks. Weighted content analysis is used to measure ERM and GG Findings - The findings derived from the content and descriptive statistics analyses indicate a consistent and ongoing rise in the adoption of ERM practices over time. However, some companies are still in the initial stages of incorporating ERM to address ESG risks. The study's findings unequivocally establish a substantial and positive relationship between ERM and GG. ERM drives GG by significantly influencing its environmental and resource productivity dimensions. The study further reveals that the impact of ERM on economic opportunities and policy responses, as well as the natural asset base, is statistically significant, albeit with relatively lower coefficient values. Practical implications - To enhance the legitimacy of organizations and foster positive stakeholder relationships, regulators, governments, and policymakers should actively promote the adoption of ERM standards that specifically address ESG risks, as outlined by COSO and WBCSD. This strategic alignment with risk management practices will ultimately contribute to improving green growth for organizations. Originality/value - To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study examining ERM's effect on GG. The study adds to the existing literature by focusing on ERM's role in a company's GG. It clarifies ERM's significant effect on diminishing emerging ESG risks and advancing GG
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 249
页数:26
相关论文
共 88 条
[21]   A risk assessment approach in selecting environmental performance indicators [J].
Diakaki, Christina ;
Grigoroudis, Evangelos ;
Stabouli, Maria .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 17 (02) :126-139
[22]   Environmental Performance, Environmental Risk and Risk Management [J].
Dobler, Michael ;
Lajili, Kaouthar ;
Zeghal, Daniel .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (01) :1-17
[23]   Enterprise risk management and solvency: The case of the listed EU insurers [J].
Duc Khuong Nguyen ;
Dinh-Tri Vo .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 113 :360-369
[24]   Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice? [J].
Fernandes, Cristina, I ;
Veiga, Pedro Mota ;
Ferreira, Joao J. M. ;
Hughes, Mathew .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (04) :2021-2037
[25]  
Fong-Woon L., 2017, Global Business and Management Research, V9, P338
[26]   Questions asked about enterprise risk management by risk practitioners [J].
Fraser, John R. S. ;
Quail, Rob ;
Simkins, Betty J. .
BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2022, 65 (03) :251-260
[27]   Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective [J].
Gordon, Lawrence A. ;
Loeb, Martin P. ;
Tseng, Chih-Yang .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2009, 28 (04) :301-327
[28]  
Granger CW., 1974, J ECONOMETRICS, V2, P111, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7, 10.1002/9780470996249.ch27, 10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7]
[29]  
GRR, 2022, The global risks report 2022, V17th
[30]   Sustainable development goal disclosures: Do they support responsible consumption and production? [J].
Gunawan, Juniati ;
Permatasari, Paulina ;
Tilt, Carol .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 246