Powering the Future: An Integrated Framework for Clean Renewable Energy Transition

被引:10
作者
Wehbi, Hanan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Environm Dynam, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
energy transition; clean renewable energy communities; metrics; sustainable land use; energy planning; sustainability; resilience; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; RESILIENCE; SYSTEM; METRICS; INITIATIVES; DESIGN; WEB;
D O I
10.3390/su16135594
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The transition to renewable energy has been recognized as a crucial step in addressing climate change and achieving greenhouse gas reduction targets, but it can also cause energy sprawl if not planned properly. Clean renewable energy communities (CREC) are emerging globally as an approach for decentralized energy systems and an alternative to traditional centralized energy systems. CREC aim to lower the energy carbon footprint, enhance local energy resilience, and improve the quality of life of residents. Through a comprehensive literature review, this study reviews metrics that can assess the impact of energy transition plans and support decision-making to select technologies that create efficient, reliable, and accessible energy systems. It classifies these metrics into a five-dimensional sustainability approach including environmental, technical, social, economic, and political and institutional dimensions. The paper proposes a conceptual framework to guide decision-makers in recognizing the role of sustainable land development, sustainable energy planning, and resiliency as an integrated approach to energy transition planning. This framework stresses mapping the place-based potential for clean renewable energy at various scales, highlights the importance of resilience in energy planning, and addresses challenges associated with energy source selection, built environment efficiency, and the energy trade. While the framework can serve as a starting point for evaluating energy transition plans, further work is needed to address the limitations of existing metrics and identify additional evaluations for mixed-energy land use that are critical to managing energy sprawl in terms of ecosystem services and other land uses.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 110 条
[11]   A perspective on equity implications of net zero energy systems [J].
Baker, Erin ;
Goldstein, Anna P. ;
Azevedo, Ines M. L. .
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 2
[12]   Advancing the state of energy equity metrics [J].
Barlow, Jay ;
Tapio, Rebecca ;
Tarekegne, Bethel .
ELECTRICITY JOURNAL, 2022, 35 (10)
[13]   Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy [J].
Bauwens, Thomas .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 93 :278-290
[14]  
Becker J., 2022, Handbook on Smart Growth Promise, Principles, and Prospects for Planning, P291
[15]   Assay of renewable energy transition: A systematic literature review [J].
Bhattarai, Utsav ;
Maraseni, Tek ;
Apan, Armando .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 833
[16]   Optimal green energy source selection: An eclectic decision [J].
Bhowmik, Chiranjib ;
Bhowmik, Sumit ;
Ray, Amitava .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 31 (05) :842-859
[17]   Full energy sector transition towards 100% renewable energy supply: Integrating power, heat, transport and industry sectors including desalination [J].
Bogdanov, Dmitrii ;
Gulagi, Ashish ;
Fasihi, Mahdi ;
Breyer, Christian .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 283
[18]   The political logics of clean energy transitions [J].
Breetz, Hanna ;
Mildenberger, Matto ;
Stokes, Leah .
BUSINESS AND POLITICS, 2018, 20 (04) :492-522
[19]   Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy [J].
Bridge, Gavin ;
Bouzarovski, Stefan ;
Bradshaw, Michael ;
Eyre, Nick .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 53 :331-340
[20]   Towards integrated sustainability assessment for energetic use of biomass: A state of the art evaluation of assessment tools [J].
Buytaert, V. ;
Muys, B. ;
Devriendt, N. ;
Pelkmans, L. ;
Kretzschmar, J. G. ;
Samson, R. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (08) :3918-3933