Comparison of ADNEX Model with GI-RADS Ultrasound Scoring System in Evaluation of Adnexal Mass

被引:0
作者
Parveen, Nazia [1 ]
Gupta, Bindiya [1 ]
Tandon, Anupama [2 ]
Gogoi, Priyanka [3 ]
机构
[1] UCMS & GTB Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Delhi, India
[2] UCMS & GTB Hosp, Dept Radiodiag, Delhi, India
[3] AIIMS Guwahati, Dept Pathol, Gauhati, Assam, India
关键词
ADNEX; Ultrasound; Neoplasia; Doppler; Malignancy; Biopsy;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-024-02000-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of the study This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of two ultrasound scoring systems, Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa (ADNEX) Model and Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS), for the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses taking histopathology as gold standard. Methods This analytical study assessed 60 patients of age > 14 years with adnexal masses, planned for surgery. Ultrasound assessment and risk categorization according to ADNEX and GI-RADS were performed 2-3 days prior to surgery. Histopathology was used as a reference standard for the calculation of validity of two ultrasound scoring systems for diagnosis of adnexal masses. Results Out of 60 women (mean age, 35.52 +/- 13.86 years; range, 16-70 years) with adnexal masses, 24 were malignant and 36 were benign. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy for the ADNEX model were 87.50%, 91.7%, 87.50%, 91.7% and 90.0%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of the GI-RADS category were 95.8%, 61.1%, 62.2%, 95.7% and 75.0%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the ADNEX model was better as compared to GI-RADS in terms of specificity and positive predictive value with a significant difference (p < 0.05). The area under curve (AUC) was 0.957 and 0.919 for ADNEX and GI-RADS, respectively (p = 0.252). Conclusion Although both ADNEX and GI-RADS systems had satisfactory diagnostic performances and high negative predictive values, the ADNEX model showed better specificity and positive predictive value in comparison with GI-RADS.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses
    Basha, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik
    Metwally, Maha Ibrahime
    Gamil, Shrif A.
    Khater, Hamada M.
    Aly, Sameh Abdelaziz
    El Sammak, Ahmed A.
    Zaitoun, Mohamed M. A.
    Khattab, Enass M.
    Azmy, Taghreed M.
    Alayouty, Nader Ali
    Mohey, Nesreen
    Almassry, Hosam Nabil
    Yousef, Hala Y.
    Ibrahim, Safaa A.
    Mohamed, Ekramy A.
    Mohamed, Abd El Motaleb
    Afifi, Amira Hamed Mohamed
    Harb, Ola A.
    Algazzar, Hesham Youssef
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 674 - 684
  • [2] Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS): diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement
    Basha, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik
    Refaat, Rania
    Ibrahim, Safaa A.
    Madkour, Nadia M.
    Awad, Awad Mahmoud
    Mohamed, Elshaimaa Mohamed
    El Sammak, Ahmed A.
    Zaitoun, Mohamed M. A.
    Dawoud, Hitham A.
    Khamis, Mai E. M.
    Mohamed, Heba A. E.
    El-Maghraby, Ahmed Mohamed
    Abdalla, Ahmed A. El-Hamid M.
    Assy, Mostafa Mohamad
    Nada, Mohamad Gamal
    Obaya, Ahmed Ali
    Abdelbary, Eman H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (11) : 5981 - 5990
  • [3] The diagnostic performance of the Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI -RADS) in adnexal masses
    Guo, Wen
    Zou, Xiuhe
    Xu, Hanyue
    Zhang, Tao
    Zhao, Yunuo
    Gao, Lu
    Duan, Wenyue
    Ma, Xuelei
    Zhang, Ling
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [4] Comparison of ultrasound-based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study
    Hu, Yanli
    Chen, Bo
    Dong, Hongmei
    Sheng, Bo
    Xiao, Zhibo
    Li, Jia
    Tian, Wei
    Lv, Furong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [5] Validation of IOTA-ADNEX Model in Discriminating Characteristics of Adnexal Masses: A Comparison with Subjective Assessment
    Jeong, Soo Young
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Lee, Yoo Young
    Kim, Tae-Joong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (06)
  • [6] Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and ADNEX for Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses An External Validation Study Conducted by Junior Sonologists
    Lai, Hong-wei
    Lyu, Guo-rong
    Kang, Zhuo
    Li, Li-ya
    Zhang, Ying
    Huang, Yi-jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (06) : 1497 - 1507
  • [7] Ultrasound Features and Ultrasound Scores in the Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses
    Pelayo, Mar
    Sancho-Sauco, Javier
    Sanchez-Zurdo, Javier
    Abarca-Martinez, Leopoldo
    Borrero-Gonzalez, Carlota
    Sainz-Bueno, Jose Antonio
    Alcazar, Juan Luis
    Pelayo-Delgado, Irene
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (13)
  • [8] Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of the Ultrasound ADNEX Model for Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors
    Peng, Xiao-Shan
    Ma, Yue
    Wang, Ling-Ling
    Li, Hai-Xia
    Zheng, Xiu-Lan
    Liu, Ying
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 5665 - 5673
  • [9] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses
    Qian, Le
    Du, Qinwen
    Jiang, Meijiao
    Yuan, Fei
    Chen, Hui
    Feng, Weiwei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [10] Shabir S., 2020, ADESH U J MEDI CAL S, V2, P17, DOI [DOI 10.25259/AUJMSR_16_2019, 10.25259/aujmsr_16_2019]