Suitability of the CICE sea ice model for seasonal prediction and positive impact of CryoSat-2 ice thickness initialization

被引:1
作者
Sun, Shan [1 ]
Solomon, Amy [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Global Syst Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Boulder, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado Boulder, NOAA, Phys Sci Lab, Boulder, CO USA
关键词
FORECAST SKILL; OCEAN; PREDICTABILITY; ENSEMBLE; EXTENT;
D O I
10.5194/tc-18-3033-2024
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The Los Alamos Community Ice CodE (CICE) sea ice model is being tested in standalone mode to identify biases that limit its suitability for seasonal prediction, where it is driven by atmospheric forcings from the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and a built-in mixed-layer ocean model in CICE. The initial conditions for the sea ice and mixed-layer ocean are also from CFSR in the control experiments. The simulated sea ice extent agrees well with observations during the warm season at all lead times up to 12 months, in both the Arctic and the Antarctic. This suggests that CICE is able to provide useful sea ice edge information for seasonal prediction. However, the model's initial conditions have ice that is too thick in the Beaufort Sea, resulting in excessive ice extent in the Arctic at 6-month lead forecasts and errors in ice volume at all lead times when compared to available observations. To address this limitation, additional CS2_IC experiments were conducted, where the Arctic ice thickness was initialized using CryoSat-2 satellite observations while keeping all other initial fields the same as in the control experiments. This reduced the positive bias in the ice thickness in the initial conditions, leading to improvements in both the simulated ice edge and the ice thickness at the seasonal timescale. This indicates that CICE has the potential to improve its seasonal forecast skill and provide more accurate predictions of sea ice extent and thickness when initialized with a more realistic sea ice thickness. This study highlights that the suitability of CICE for seasonal prediction depends on various factors, including initial conditions such as sea ice thickness, in addition to sea ice coverage, as well as oceanic and atmospheric conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:3033 / 3048
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Utilizing CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness to initialize a coupled ice-ocean modeling system [J].
Allard, Richard A. ;
Farrell, Sinead L. ;
Hebert, David A. ;
Johnston, William F. ;
Li, Li ;
Kurtz, Nathan T. ;
Phelps, Michael W. ;
Posey, Pamela G. ;
Tilling, Rachel ;
Ridout, Andy ;
Wallcraft, Alan J. .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (06) :1265-1280
[2]  
Amante C., 2009, Tech. Rep., DOI 10.7289/V5C8276M
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ACIA Overview report
[4]  
Arribas A, 2011, MON WEATHER REV, V139, P1891, DOI 10.1175/2011MWR3615.1
[5]   Influence of initial conditions and climate forcing on predicting Arctic sea ice [J].
Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E. ;
Bitz, C. M. ;
Holland, M. M. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 38
[6]   Persistence and Inherent Predictability of Arctic Sea Ice in a GCM Ensemble and Observations [J].
Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, Edward ;
Armour, Kyle C. ;
Bitz, Cecilia M. ;
DeWeaver, Eric .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2011, 24 (01) :231-250
[7]   Diagnostics of the oceanic thermohaline circulation in a coupled climate model [J].
Bleck, R ;
Sun, S .
GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2004, 40 (3-4) :233-248
[8]   Improving Met Office seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice using assimilation of CryoSat-2 thickness [J].
Blockley, Edward W. ;
Peterson, K. Andrew .
CRYOSPHERE, 2018, 12 (11) :3419-3438
[9]   A Mechanism for the Arctic Sea Ice Spring Predictability Barrier [J].
Bushuk, Mitchell ;
Winton, Michael ;
Bonan, David B. ;
Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, Edward ;
Delworth, Thomas L. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (13)
[10]   Regional Arctic sea-ice prediction: potential versus operational seasonal forecast skill [J].
Bushuk, Mitchell ;
Msadek, Rym ;
Winton, Michael ;
Vecchi, Gabriel ;
Yang, Xiaosong ;
Rosati, Anthony ;
Gudgel, Rich .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2019, 52 (5-6) :2721-2743