User experiences of situational awareness systems in infrastructure construction

被引:2
作者
Lappalainen, Eelon [1 ]
Uusitalo, Petri [1 ]
Seppanen, Olli [1 ]
Peltokorpi, Antti [1 ]
Ainamo, Antti [1 ,2 ]
Reinbold, Ana [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Civil Engn, POB 11000, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
[2] Inst Comp Sci, Sandbox, Tartu, Estonia
关键词
Situational awareness; infrastructure; construction management; individual judgment; TECHNOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; BIASES;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2024.2366339
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Infrastructure construction (IC) projects are dynamic, complex, and difficult to control and manage. Situational awareness (SA) systems have attracted growing interest in construction literature as an aid for human decision-making in order to forecast changes in project and operations situations. While technological advancements have been achieved in SA systems, very little empirical evidence exists on the actual experiences of IC professionals in relation to SA system usage. We interviewed 23 IC professionals to obtain data, which data we then analyzed by utilizing open coding. Based on our analysis, IC professionals adopt and integrate SA systems individually. On the other hand, often their SA exhibits a bias in favor of the subjective viewpoint of whoever is the dominant or responsible individual in their unit or team, and concealing facts by one or more people appears common. We thus conclude that SA systems can raise IC professionals' awareness of a situation in ways that are objectively and easily visible and accessible to every individual. SA systems can also be used to conceal SA. This study contributes to earlier technology-focused research by revealing how the behavior of dominant individuals affects the user experience of SA systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1012 / 1025
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Knowledge transfers and project-based learning in large scale infrastructure development projects: an exploratory and comparative ex-post analysis [J].
Aerts, Geoffrey ;
Dooms, Michael ;
Haezendonck, Elvira .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (03) :224-240
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, DOI 10.1177/154193120004400150
[4]  
Baker S.E., 2012, NATL CTR RES METHODS
[5]   Searching for the Root Causes of Maritime Casualties - Individual Competence or Organisational Culture? [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
WMU JOURNAL OF MARITIME AFFAIRS, 2005, 4 (02) :131-145
[6]  
Bedny G., 1999, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, V3, P63, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15327566IJCE03015, 10.1207/s15327566ijce0301_5, DOI 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0301_5]
[7]   Integrating knowledge in infrastructure projects: the interplay between formal and informal knowledge governance mechanisms [J].
Biersteker, Erwin ;
Van Marrewijk, Alfons .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2023, 41 (10) :859-874
[8]  
Brehmer B., 2007, INT C2 J, V7, P211
[9]   Modeling Tower Crane Operator Visibility to Minimize the Risk of Limited Situational Awareness [J].
Cheng, Tao ;
Teizer, Jochen .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 28 (03)
[10]   Real-time resource location data collection and visualization technology for construction safety and activity monitoring applications [J].
Cheng, Tao ;
Teizer, Jochen .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 34 :3-15