Managing intermittency of renewable power in sustainable production of methanol, coupled with direct air capture

被引:14
作者
Fulham, George J. [1 ]
Mendoza-Moreno, Paula V. [1 ]
Marek, Ewa J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Chem Engn & Biotechnol, Philippa Fawcett Dr, Cambridge CB3 0AS, Cambs, England
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY PRICES; OFFSHORE WIND FARMS; CARBON-DIOXIDE; COST; OPTIMIZATION; ENERGY; CO2; ELECTROLYSIS; REANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1039/d4ee00933a
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Coupling direct air capture (DAC) with methanol production is a technically attainable opportunity for CO2 capture and utilisation (CCU). The process, known as power-to-methanol (PtM), consumes large amounts of renewable electricity for water electrolysis and DAC. However, the time-variability of renewable power remains a major challenge. Here, we consider erecting a wind farm as part of a PtM facility and propose using four parallel reactors to adjust the methanol production according to daily wind power generation, which we model for 90 onshore and offshore locations with real-world data. Batteries and reserve storage of compressed H2 and CO2 allow methanol production during near-zero availability of wind power. We investigate different operation strategies, aiming to either minimise the reserve storage or maximise production, ultimately finding minimised storage as more cost-effective. The resulting selling price of methanol from a plant powered by an onshore wind farm is $1400 per tonne, rising to $2200 for offshore wind power because of higher farm installation costs. However, with a well-located wind farm, coupled with improvements to DAC, electrolysis, and catalysts, the selling price falls as low as $300 per tonne of methanol, reaching parity with fossil fuel-derived methanol. Purchasing stable grid power for PtM avoids issues of intermittency, and results in a lower methanol selling price of $960 per tonne, falling to $340 with process improvements. However, life cycle assessment (LCA) shows the global warming potential (GWP) of the grid-based cases is no better than producing methanol from natural gas; whereas, wind-powered DAC-PtM delivers net-negative GWP between -760 and -1240 kgCO2eq. per tMeOH, demonstrating successful CCU. This study leverages worldwide wind data, process modelling, and life cycle assessment to reveal the potential of dynamic methanol production for atmospheric CO2 drawdown, while handling power intermittency and minimising reliance on reserve storage.
引用
收藏
页码:4594 / 4621
页数:28
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   Comparative techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of power-to-methanol synthesis pathways [J].
Adnan, Muflih A. ;
Kibria, Md Golam .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 278
[2]   Review of 600-2500 kW sized wind turbines and optimization of hub height for maximum wind energy yield realization [J].
Alam, Md Mahbub ;
Rehman, Shafiqur ;
Meyer, Josua P. ;
Al-Hadhrami, Luai M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (08) :3839-3849
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, World energy statistics and balances
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, CARB FOOTPR METH
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, RENEWABLE ENERGY TEC
[7]   Impact of Daily Startup-Shutdown Conditions on the Production of Solar Methanol over a Commercial Cu-ZnO-Al2O3 Catalyst [J].
Ash-Kurlander, Uri ;
Martin, Oliver ;
Fontana, Luca D. ;
Patil, Vikas R. ;
Bernegger, Men ;
Mondelli, Cecilia ;
Perez-Ramirez, Javier ;
Steinfeld, Aldo .
ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 4 (05) :565-572
[8]  
Baldwin D., 2017, Development of High Pressure Hydrogen Storage Tank for Storage and Gaseous Truck Delivery
[9]   Life cycle assessment of hydrogen from proton exchange membrane water electrolysis in future energy systems [J].
Bareiss, Kay ;
de la Rua, Cristina ;
Moeckl, Maximilian ;
Hamacher, Thomas .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 237 :862-872
[10]   Carbon Footprint of Electricity Generation in Brazil: An Analysis of the 2016-2026 Period [J].
Barros, Murillo Vetroni ;
Piekarski, Cassiano Moro ;
de Francisco, Antonio Carlos .
ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (06)