Using design thinking to create and implement a 3D digital library of anatomical specimens

被引:0
作者
Titmus, Morgan [1 ]
de Oliveira, Beatriz I. R. [2 ]
Ellery, Paul [1 ]
Whittaker, Gary [1 ]
Radley, Hannah [1 ]
Radunski, Milo [1 ]
Ng, Leo [3 ]
Helmholz, Petra [4 ]
Sun, Zhonghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Curtin Med Sch, Bentley, WA, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Curtin Sch Allied Hlth, Bentley, WA, Australia
[3] Swinburne Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Curtin Univ, Sch Earth & Planetary Sci, Bentley, WA, Australia
关键词
3D visualization; anatomy visualisation; cadaver; design thinking; digital technology; learning resource; photogrammetry; student-centered; GROSS-ANATOMY; EDUCATION; VISUALIZATION; CURRICULUM; RESOURCES; KNOWLEDGE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1002/ca.24198
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
Design thinking (DT) is a five-stage process (empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test) that guides the creation of user-centered solutions to complex problems. DT is in common use outside of science but has rarely been applied to anatomical education. The use of DT in this study identified the need for flexible access to anatomical specimens outside of the anatomy laboratory and guided the creation of a digital library of three-dimensional (3D) anatomical specimens (3D Anatomy Viewer). To test whether the resource was fit for purpose, a mixed-methods student evaluation was undertaken. Student surveys (n = 46) were employed using the system usability scale (SUS) and an unvalidated acceptability questionnaire. These verified that 3D Anatomy Viewer was usable (SUS of 72%) and acceptable (agreement range of 77%-93% on all Likert-type survey statements, Cronbach's alpha = 0.929). Supplementary interviews (n = 5) were analyzed through content analysis and revealed three main themes: (1) a credible online supplementary learning resource; (2) learning anatomy with 3D realism and interactivity; (3) user recommendations for expanding the number of anatomical models, test questions, and gamification elements. These data demonstrate that a DT framework can be successfully applied to anatomical education for creation of a practical learning resource. Anatomy educators should consider employing a DT framework where student-centered solutions to learner needs are required.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 431
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Applying Design Thinking to Curriculum Reform
    Anderson, Jordan
    Calahan, Christopher F.
    Gooding, Holly
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2017, 92 (04) : 427 - 427
  • [2] The importance of design thinking in medical education
    Badwan, Basil
    Bothara, Roshit
    Latijnhouwers, Mieke
    Smithies, Alisdair
    Sandars, John
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2018, 40 (04) : 425 - 426
  • [3] How we use social media to supplement a novel curriculum in medical education
    Bahner, David P.
    Adkins, Eric
    Patel, Nilesh
    Donley, Chad
    Nagel, Rollin
    Kman, Nicholas E.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (06) : 439 - 444
  • [4] An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale
    Bangor, Aaron
    Kortum, Philip T.
    Miller, James T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2008, 24 (06) : 574 - 594
  • [5] Enhancement of Anatomical Education Using Augmented Reality: An Empirical Study of Body Painting
    Barmaki, Roghayeh
    Yu, Kevin
    Pearlman, Rebecca
    Shingles, Richard
    Bork, Felix
    Osgood, Greg M.
    Navab, Nassir
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2019, 12 (06) : 599 - 609
  • [6] Anatomy Education for the YouTube Generation
    Barry, Denis S.
    Marzouk, Fadi
    Chulak-Oglu, Kyrylo
    Bennett, Deirdre
    Tierney, Paul
    O'Keeffe, Gerard W.
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2016, 9 (01) : 90 - 96
  • [7] Classic Versus Millennial Medical Lab Anatomy
    Benninger, Brion
    Matsler, Nik
    Delamarter, Taylor
    [J]. CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2014, 27 (07) : 988 - 993
  • [8] Cinematic Rendering in Anatomy: A Crossover Study Comparing a Novel 3D Reconstruction Technique to Conventional Computed Tomography
    Binder, Johannes S.
    Scholz, Michael
    Ellmann, Stephan
    Uder, Michael
    Gruetzmann, Robert
    Weber, Georg F.
    Krautz, Christian
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2021, 14 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [9] Learning across silos: Design Factories as hubs for co-creation
    Bjorklund, Tua A.
    Keipi, Teo
    Celik, Sine
    Ekman, Kalevi
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2019, 54 (04) : 552 - 565
  • [10] Brenner W., 2016, Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3_1, 10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3]