Are expectations of labour and birth fulfilled? A qualitative investigation of first-time parents

被引:3
作者
Colciago, Elisabetta [1 ]
Robinson, Ann [2 ]
Ornaghi, Sara [1 ,3 ]
Fumagalli, Simona [1 ,3 ]
Antolini, Laura [1 ]
Nespoli, Antonella [1 ,3 ]
Brown, Anna Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Sch Med & Surg, Via Cadore 48, I-20900 Monza, Italy
[2] Univ Surrey, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Div Midwifery, Guildford, Surrey, England
[3] Fdn IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Dept Obstet, Monza, Italy
关键词
birthing experience; family-centred approach; fear of labour; feeling of uncertainty; fulfilment of birth expectations; memories of birth; midwifery care; parents' birth expectations; respectful maternity care; unexpected birth outcomes; CHILDBIRTH EXPECTATIONS; EXPERIENCE; PREGNANCY; LATENT; PHASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jan.16274
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimTo describe if first-time parents' expectations of labour and birth, explored during the third trimester of pregnancy, were fulfilled or not when investigated 1 year following birth. DesignQualitative Husserlian phenomenological approach. MethodsThe sample comprises 10 parents (five couples), who participated in an online semi-structured audio-recorded individual interview conducted 1 year after birth, between September 2020 and October 2020. Parents' expectations of labour and birth, described throughout a focus group discussion on pregnancy, were compared with their experience explored 1 year after birth. A thematic analysis was adopted and member checking was used to validate participants' thoughts. ResultsParticipants gave birth in a II level maternity unit and one-to-one midwifery care was provided. Although during the focus group conducted in pregnancy, women reported being aware of the unpredictable nature of childbirth, they expressed sadness and failure after experiencing some unexpected interventions. The midwife was a reassuring guide, as expected; however, sometimes, the communication was not effective, and women perceived lack of support. Some women partly blame themselves for not being prepared to manage labour pain, which hurt more than expected. Feeling of uncertainty about events were experienced in relation to seeking care at an early stage of labour, which confirmed the fears expressed during pregnancy. During the antenatal focus group discussion, fathers doubted they could be helpful for the labouring women. This negative emotion was confirmed after birth. However, they understood the importance to be present and to support their partner. ConclusionsOne year after birth, participants had consistent memories of their birth experience. Professionals might identify fundamental components of quality maternity care that are meaningful for parents, with the potential to generate a long-term positive health impact on them. Respectful maternity care should be ensured through a family-centred approach, with the aim to promote satisfaction. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThe study highlights the importance of taking parents' expectations into account when providing antenatal care to tailor individualized support that addresses their distinct needs and preferences. Healthcare professionals might consider initiating a post-natal discussion with parents to assess whether their needs and perspectives have been addressed. This perspective may present valuable insights to achieve long-term positive outcomes, provide high-quality maternity care, address issues and make improvements. ImpactThe study showed that 1 year after birth, parents can accurately recall their birth. They might also give significant insights into fundamental components of care that they value as crucial to shape a positive birthing experience. Professionals should use this information to build solutions, promoting long-term well-being for parents. Respectful interactions and trusting relationships emerged as key elements in parents' experience. A midwifery care focused on parents' needs may contribute to the achievement of positive birth memories. Reporting MethodThis study used the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 967
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Who, P73
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, European Perinatal Health Report
[3]   A qualitative analysis of women's short accounts of labour and birth in a Western Australian public tertiary hospital [J].
Bayes, Sara ;
Fenwick, Jennifer ;
Hauck, Yvonne .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2008, 53 (01) :53-61
[4]   The birth experience and subsequent maternal caregiving attitudes and behavior: a birth cohort study [J].
Bell, A. F. ;
Rubin, L. H. ;
Davis, J. M. ;
Golding, J. ;
Adejumo, O. A. ;
Carter, C. S. .
ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 22 (05) :613-620
[5]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[6]  
Brodrick A., 2008, EVIDENCE BASED MIDWI, V6, P65
[7]   Swedish women's experiences of seeking care and being admitted during the latent phase of labour: A grounded theory study [J].
Carlsson, Ing-Marie ;
Hallberg, Lillemor R-M. ;
Pettersson, Karen Odberg .
MIDWIFERY, 2009, 25 (02) :172-180
[8]   Attitudes to emotional expression, social support and postnatal adjustment in new parents [J].
Castle, Helen ;
Slade, Pauline ;
Barranco-Wadlow, Maria ;
Rogers, Maeve .
JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 26 (03) :180-194
[9]  
Christiaens Wendy, 2007, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, V7, P26
[10]   The unpredictable nature of labour and birth: A qualitative investigation regarding expectations of Italian parents to-be [J].
Colciago, Elisabetta ;
Brown, Anna Maria ;
Ornaghi, Sara ;
Antolini, Laura ;
Nespoli, Antonella ;
Fumagalli, Simona ;
Robinson, Ann .
MIDWIFERY, 2022, 108