Effect of an abrupt rough-to-smooth surface roughness transition on wind farm wakes: An LES and analytical modeling study

被引:4
作者
Kethavath, Naveen N. [1 ]
Ghaisas, Niranjan S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Hyderabad, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Sangareddy 502285, Telengana, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Hyderabad, Dept Climate Change, Sangareddy 502285, Telangana, India
关键词
BOUNDARY-LAYER; THRUST COEFFICIENT; TURBINE WAKES; SUDDEN CHANGE; TURBULENCE; VELOCITY; FLOW; PROFILES;
D O I
10.1063/5.0202733
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Large-eddy simulations (LES) are performed on the flow over a wind farm sited behind an abrupt rough-to-smooth surface roughness jump. The change in surface roughness affects both the first-order and second-order turbulent statistics. The usual deficit, i.e., the difference between the velocities upstream of the entire wind farm and downstream of a turbine, attains negative values close to the ground, which makes it difficult for modeling within the usual Gaussian radial-shape framework. A different definition, i.e., the difference in velocity at the same location with and without a turbine on a heterogeneous surface, is always positive and is amenable to Gaussian shape-based modeling. For the setup considered here, wind farms sited downstream of a surface roughness jump produce more power than a wind farm sited on a homogeneously rough surface. This increase is primarily because of the larger power generated by the downstream turbines and only slightly due to the increased power of the first-row turbine. The farm performance is affected by the distance between the abrupt change in surface roughness and the position of the first row of turbines. The wind farm performance is also dependent on the aerodynamic roughness upstream of the surface roughness jump. Two single-turbine analytical models and three wake-merging strategies are evaluated for their ability to predict the velocity deficits. A corrected form of the standard Gaussian model with a recently proposed wake-merging methodology, applicable for a varying background field, is found to be insensitive to the tunable model parameter and is consistently in line with the LES results.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A new Gaussian-based analytical wake model for wind turbines considering ambient turbulence intensities and thrust coefficient effects [J].
Ishihara, Takeshi ;
Qian, Guo-Wei .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2018, 177 :275-292
[22]   Advances in large-eddy simulation of a wind turbine wake [J].
Jimenez, A. ;
Crespo, A. ;
Migoya, E. ;
Garcia, J. .
SCIENCE OF MAKING TORQUE FROM WIND, 2007, 75
[23]  
Katic I., 1986, Proceedings of European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, Rome, P407
[24]   Large-eddy simulation and analytical modeling study of the wake of a wind turbine behind an abrupt rough-to-smooth surface roughness transition [J].
Kethavath, Naveen N. N. ;
Mondal, Kingshuk ;
Ghaisas, Niranjan S. S. .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2022, 34 (12)
[25]   A new wake-merging method for wind-farm power prediction in the presence of heterogeneous background velocity fields [J].
Lanzilao, Luca ;
Meyers, Johan .
WIND ENERGY, 2022, 25 (02) :237-259
[26]   ENERGY EFFECTIVENESS OF ARBITRARY ARRAYS OF WIND TURBINES [J].
LISSAMAN, PBS .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY, 1979, 3 (06) :323-328
[27]   Large Eddy Simulation Study of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flow over an Abrupt Rough-to-Smooth Surface Roughness Transition [J].
Mondal, Kingshuk ;
Kethavath, Naveen N. ;
Abhinay, Kondu ;
Ghaisas, Niranjan S. .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2023, 188 (02) :229-257
[28]   RELATIONS BETWEEN SURFACE FLUXES AND MEAN PROFILES OF VELOCITY, TEMPERATURE AND CONCENTRATION, DOWNWIND OF A CHANGE IN SURFACE-ROUGHNESS [J].
MULHEARN, PJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1977, 103 (438) :785-802
[29]   Analytical Modeling of Wind Farms: A New Approach for Power Prediction [J].
Niayifar, Amin ;
Porte-Agel, Fernando .
ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (09)
[30]   CHANGE OF TERRAIN ROUGHNESS AND THE WIND PROFILE [J].
PANOFSKY, HA ;
TOWNSEND, AA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1964, 90 (384) :147-155