EU Enlargement Policy Goes East: Historical and Comparative Takes on the EU's Rule of Law Conditionality vis-à-vis Ukraine

被引:1
作者
Rabinovych, Maryna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agder, Dept Polit Sci & Management, Kristiansand, Norway
关键词
EU; Ukraine; Conditionality; Rule of law; Western Balkans;
D O I
10.1007/s40803-024-00223-6
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The article discusses a unique case of the EU's application of rule of law conditionality vis-& agrave;-vis Ukraine, while the latter is in active war with Russia. It is demonstrated that the EU utilized momentum, created by the confluence of the invasion and Ukraine's EU candidateship, to apply ambitious rule of law conditionality in its relations with Ukraine. Despite the unique strategic and political context, the conditionality is path-dependent, strongly relying on the achievements and outstanding tasks of the EU's pre-war rule of law promotion in Ukraine. Also, both the design and substance of EU conditionality vis-& agrave;-vis Ukraine strongly resemble the one the EU applied vis-& agrave;-vis Western Balkans. This concerns specifically the contents of conditionality, focusing on building effective anticorruption institutions and judicial reform. Current geostrategic pressures have not yet led to major changes in the philosophy behind the enlargement process or the EU's framing of the rule of law concept. Yet, changes to be underscored include the EU's focus on specific benchmarks within pre-defined realms and strong alignment between political and financial instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 737
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Wartime EU: consequences of the Russia - Ukraine war on the enlargement process [J].
Anghel, Veronica ;
Dzankic, Jelena .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2023, 45 (03) :487-501
[2]  
Barnes A, 2015, 10 TIME CHARM IMF LO
[3]   EU Enlargement in Disregard of the Rule of Law: A Way Forward Following the Unsuccessful Dispute Settlement Between Croatia and Slovenia and the Name Change of Macedonia [J].
Basheska, Elena .
HAGUE JOURNAL ON THE RULE OF LAW, 2022, 14 (2-3) :221-256
[4]  
Besch S, 2023, CARNEGIE EUROPE 1024
[5]  
Borrell Josep, 2022, EUROPE INTERREGNUM O
[6]  
Borzel T, 2004, WORKSH DEM PROM
[7]  
Buras P., 2023, Catch-27: The contradictory thinking about enlargement in the EU
[8]  
Burgess P, 2017, JURISPRUDENCE, V8, P480, DOI 10.1080/20403313.2017.1341203
[9]  
Burlyuk O, 2017, EAST EUR POLITICS, V33, P36, DOI 10.1080/21599165.2017.1280470
[10]  
Callies C, 2023, VERFASSUNGSBLOG 0706